loadtxt currently has a keyword to change the comment token. The PR
#4612 [1] enables to define multiple comment token for a file. It is
motivated by #2633 [2]
What is your position on this one ?
Joseph
[1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4612
[2] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/i
I have an old PR [1] to fix #2142 [2]. The idea is to have a new keyword
for all fft functions to define the normalisation of the fft:
- if 'norm' is None (the default), the normalisation is the current one:
fft() is not normalized ans ifft is normalized by 1/n.
- if norm is "ortho", the direct and
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~%20m-mat/MT/SFMT/index.html
What would you like to say about it?
--
Robert Kern
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy
Naturally, youd want to avoid redoing the indexing where you can, which is
another good reason to factor out the indexing mechanisms into separate
classes. A factor two performance difference does not get me too excited;
again, I think it would be the other way around for an out-of-cache dataset
be
FYI pandas DOES use a very performant hash table impl for unique (and
value_counts). Sorted state IS maintained
by underlying Index implmentation.
https://github.com/pydata/pandas/blob/master/pandas/hashtable.pyx
In [8]: a = np.random.randint(10, size=(1,))
In [9]: %timeit np.unique(a)
1000 l
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I should clarify: I am speaking about my implementation, I havnt looked at
> the numpy implementation for a while so im not sure what it is up to. Note
> that by 'almost free', we are still talking about thre
I should clarify: I am speaking about my implementation, I havnt looked at
the numpy implementation for a while so im not sure what it is up to. Note
that by 'almost free', we are still talking about three passes over the
whole array plus temp allocations, but I am assuming a use-case where the
var
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <
> hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río <
>> jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río <
> jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río <
>> jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 3,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río <
jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I think the ayes will have it.
>>
>
> As I told Chuck (because I now get to call Charles Chuck, right? :-)), I
> a
Jaime,
I had the same feeling when John Hunter gave me commit rights to
matplotlib. I later asked him about it, and he said that he gives commit
rights to those who annoy the mailing list the most. So, it might not be
*that* humbling... :-P
Cheers!
Ben Root
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Jaim
http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~%20m-mat/MT/SFMT/index.html
--
-- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río <
jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río <
> jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <
>> hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure about t
On Mi, 2014-09-03 at 18:47 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
> wrote:
> +1; though I am relatively new to the scene, Jaime's
> contributions have always stood out to me as thoughtful.
>
>
> On Thu,
14 matches
Mail list logo
