Ok, I tested matplotlib master against numpy master, and there were no
errors. I did get a bunch of new deprecation warnings though such as:
/nas/home/broot/centos6/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib-1.5.dev1-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/colorbar.py:539:
VisibleDeprecationWarning:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Benjamin Root ben.v.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I tested matplotlib master against numpy master, and there were no
errors. I did get a bunch of new deprecation warnings though such as:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Do, 2015-08-27 at 10:45 +0100, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Bryan Van de Ven
On Aug 27, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
The 'president' idea
...seems to be predicated on a steady stream of people who: actually want job,
don't mind campaigning, are willing to accept any and all blame, and have the
technical experience to make final
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Do, 2015-08-27 at 10:45 +0100, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io
wrote:
On Aug 27, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Matthew Brett
On Do, 2015-08-27 at 17:22 +0100, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:11 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:34 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:11 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:34 PM,
Ok, I just wanted to make sure I understood the issue before going bug
hunting. Chances are, it has been a bug on our end for a while now. Just to
make sure, is the following valid?
arr = np.zeros((5, 3))
ind = np.array([True, True, True, False, True])
arr[ind] # gives a 4x3 result
Running
On Do, 2015-08-27 at 11:15 -0400, Benjamin Root wrote:
Ok, I just wanted to make sure I understood the issue before going bug
hunting. Chances are, it has been a bug on our end for a while now.
Just to make sure, is the following valid?
arr = np.zeros((5, 3))
ind = np.array([True, True,
The reason why we don't have that extra slice is because we may not know
ahead of time that we are dealing with a 2D array. It could be a 1D array.
I guess we could use ellipses, but I wanted to make sure that the numpy
devs consider the above to be perfectly valid semantics because it is
Hi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:11 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:34 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I don't really see a problem with codifying the status quo.
That's
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi Travis,
Thanks for taking the time to write up your thoughts!
I have many thoughts in return, but I will try to restrict myself to two
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:34 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I don't really see a problem with codifying the status quo.
That's an excellent point.If we believe that the current situation
is
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:34 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I don't really see a problem with codifying the status quo.
That's an excellent point.If we believe that the current situation
is the best possible, both now and in the future, then codifying the
status quo is an
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io wrote:
On Aug 27, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
The 'president' idea
...seems to be predicated on a steady stream of people who: actually want
job, don't mind campaigning, are
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:11 PM,
On 2015-08-27 11:06:10, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, in the spirit of fruitful discussion, can I ask what y'all
consider to be the current problems with working on numpy (other
than the technical ones). What is numpy doing well, and what
is it doing badly? What risks
On Do, 2015-08-27 at 12:34 -0700, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
On 2015-08-27 11:06:10, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, in the spirit of fruitful discussion, can I ask what y'all
consider to be the current problems with working on numpy (other
than the technical ones).
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:11 PM,
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io wrote:
On Aug 27, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
In the case of the 'core' model, we have some compelling testimony
from someone with a great deal of experience:
Much of this early
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I speculate, that a good governance model would have:
* one 'president' who has to take final responsibility for all decisions;
* this president might well have a fixed term, maybe with limits on
the number of
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a first draft of a governance document for NumPy.
Thanks for this.
I wasn't sure from your email whether you were asking
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a first draft of a governance document for
Hi all,
Here's a first draft of a governance document for NumPy.
A few people have seen sneak peeks and have suggested possibly
reorganizing it either by taking some of the how consensus works
stuff out into a separate document, or alternatively keeping that
stuff in the foreground and moving
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I speculate, that a good governance model would have:
* one 'president' who has to take final responsibility for all decisions;
*
On Do, 2015-08-27 at 10:45 +0100, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io
wrote:
On Aug 27, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
In the case of the 'core' model, we have some compelling testimony
Hi again,
The change seems to have possibly unforeseen consequences because some
ufuncs don't declare all possible types, e.g.:
a = np.arange(10, dtype=np.int32)
out = np.zeros_like(a)
np.fabs(a, out=out)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: ufunc
Daniel Bliss wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone give me some advice for translating this equation into code
using numpy?
eta(t) = lim(dt - 0) N(0, 1/sqrt(dt)),
where N(a, b) is a Gaussian random variable of mean a and variance b**2.
This is a heuristic definition of a white noise process.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:51 AM Daniel Bliss daniel.p.bl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can anyone give me some advice for translating this equation into code
using numpy?
eta(t) = lim(dt - 0) N(0, 1/sqrt(dt)),
where N(a, b) is a Gaussian random variable of mean a and variance b**2.
This is a
The change also seems to have made datetime64 computations stricter:
np.datetime64('2010') - np.datetime64('2000-01-01')
numpy.timedelta64(3653,'D')
np.datetime64('2010') - np.datetime64('2000-01-01T00:00:00Z')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Stefan van der Walt
stef...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi Matthew
On 2015-08-26 10:50:47, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
In short, the core structure seems to be
On Aug 27, 2015, at 9:36 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
So, in answer to your question, it's difficult to know if a particular
governance model is successful. It isn't enough that a project has
lasted, or is still active, because there are so many factors in play.
On
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io wrote:
On Aug 27, 2015, at 9:36 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
So, in answer to your question, it's difficult to know if a particular
governance model is successful. It isn't enough that a project
On Aug 27, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
In the case of the 'core' model, we have some compelling testimony
from someone with a great deal of experience:
Much of this early structure (CVS, web site, cabal [core group],
etc.) was copied verbatim by
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Stefan van der Walt
stef...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi Matthew
On 2015-08-26 10:50:47, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
In short, the core structure seems to be characteristically
associated with a conservatism and lack of vision that causes
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a first draft of a governance document for NumPy.
Thanks for this.
I wasn't sure from your email whether you were asking for feedback as
to whether this was the right governance model?
I mean that -
Hi Sebastian
On 2015-08-27 14:45:50, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Agreed. Are not PEP's/NEP's just that (and could possibly be
formalized more, not sure how much they are in the current
proposal) in some sense? Since they have a sponsor/author who
can be said to be
37 matches
Mail list logo
