Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.sign and object comparisons

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > That would be my gut feeling as well. Returning `NaN` could also make > sense, but I guess we run into problems since we do not know the input > type. So `None` seems like the only option here I can think of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.sign and object comparisons

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:23:10 -0700 Stephan Hoyer wrote: > > My inclination is that return NaN would be the appropriate choice. It's > certainly consistent with the behavior for float dtypes -- my expectation > for object dtype behavior is that it works exactly like applying the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.sign and object comparisons

On Mo, 2015-08-31 at 10:23 -0700, Stephan Hoyer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Sebastian Berg > wrote: > That would be my gut feeling as well. Returning `NaN` could > also make > > sense, but I guess we run into problems

Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.sign and object comparisons

On So, 2015-08-30 at 21:09 -0700, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: > There's been some work going on recently on Py2 vs Py3 object > comparisons. If you want all the background, see gh-6265 and follow > the links there. > > > There is a half baked PR in the works, gh-6269, that tries to unify >