Re: [Numpy-discussion] Win32 installer: please test it

2008-04-14 Thread joep
Everything installed without problem on Intel Pentium M on my notebook recognized as SSE2 capable. Installer found Python 2.5. immediately, which I just installed and all my windows environment settings are still setup for python 2.4 Thanks, Josef numpy.test() Numpy is installed in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] URGENT: Re: 1.1.0rc1, Win32 Installer: please test it

2008-05-20 Thread joep
Testing the windows installers On an 8 years old Windows 2000 with Intel processor (which ?) no sse, installed numpy-1/1/0rc1-nosse.exe * with Python 2.4.3 (no ctypes) - numpy.test(): 1001 test OK, no errors or failures - numpy.test(): 1271 tests, errors=12, failures=1 no crash,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] URGENT: Re: 1.1.0rc1, Win32 Installer: please test it

2008-05-20 Thread joep
joep wrote: Testing the windows installers On an 8 years old Windows 2000 with Intel processor (which ?) no sse, installed numpy-1/1/0rc1-nosse.exe * with Python 2.4.3 (no ctypes) - numpy.test(): 1001 test OK, no errors or failures typo: missed with option all=True

[Numpy-discussion] new numpy docs, missing function and parse error - dirichlet distribution

2008-05-22 Thread joep
Hi, I was just looking around at the new numpy documentation and got a xhtml parsing error on the page (with Firefox): http://mentat.za.net/numpy/refguide/random.xhtml#index-29351 The offending line contains $X pprox prod_{i=1}^{k}{x^{lpha_i-1}_i}$ in the docstring of the dirichlet

Re: [Numpy-discussion] new numpy docs, missing function and parse error - dirichlet distribution

2008-05-22 Thread joep
On May 22, 11:11 am, joep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When looking for this, I found that the Dirichlet distribution is missing from the new Docstring Wiki,http://sd-2116.dedibox.fr/doc/Docstrings/numpy/random Actually, a search on the wiki finds dirichlet in http://sd-2116.dedibox.fr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] new numpy docs, missing function and parse error - dirichlet distribution

2008-05-22 Thread joep
On May 22, 1:30 pm, Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: to, 2008-05-22 kello 09:51 -0700, joep kirjoitti:  It is not intentional. And for the majority of cases this does not happen, and I can fix this for numpy.random.mtrand. Thanks for reporting. I was looking some more

[Numpy-discussion] buglet: Dirichlet missing in numpy.random.__all__ as defined in numpy/random/info.py

2008-05-22 Thread joep
The Dirichlet distribution is missing in __all__ in http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/browser/trunk/numpy/random/info.py As a consequence numpy.lookfor does not find Dirichlet numpy.lookfor('dirichlet') Search results for 'dirichlet' -- import numpy.random

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.2.0rc2 tagged! --PLEASE TEST--

2008-09-15 Thread joep
all ok on python 2.4 WindowsXP sse2 scipy test results are the same as with numpy 1.1.0 C:\Josef\work-oth\sort\pypipython Python 2.4.3 (#69, Mar 29 2006, 17:35:34) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import numpy

[Numpy-discussion] python 2.4 incompatibility in numpy.lookfor in numpy 1.2.0rc2

2008-09-23 Thread joep
Hi, I was trying to use lookfor on python 2.4 and got an exception with np.lookfor because of a missing method in pkgutil that was added in python 2.5. see the following session np.lookfor('range') Traceback (most recent call last): File pyshell#55, line 1, in ? np.lookfor('range') File

[Numpy-discussion] np.min(np.inf,1000) == np.inf

2008-09-23 Thread joep
I just fell over this: np.min(np.inf,1000) 1.#INF min(np.inf,1000) 1000 np.max(-np.inf,1000) -1.#INF max(-np.inf,1000) 1000 Is this known behavior? I finally realized, that I have to do this (the doc string says array like) np.min([np.inf,1000]) 1000.0 np.max([-np.inf,1000]) 1000.0

Re: [Numpy-discussion] python 2.4 incompatibility in numpy.lookfor in numpy 1.2.0rc2

2008-09-23 Thread joep
revision Josef On Sep 23, 4:55 pm, Jarrod Millman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 15:18, joep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was trying to use lookfor on python 2.4 and got an exception with np.lookfor

Re: [Numpy-discussion] python 2.4 incompatibility in numpy.lookfor in numpy 1.2.0rc2

2008-09-23 Thread joep
On Sep 23, 6:48 pm, joep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A possible solution would be in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pauli-virtanen/scipy/pydocweb/revision/386 It seems to be possible to be used in the same way when iter_modules is not available. The usage in ``_lookfor_generate_cache`` in lib

[Numpy-discussion] vectorize in new.instancemethod and *args

2008-09-26 Thread joep
I have a question about the use of vectorize in new.instancemethod: Using vectorize with *args requires adjustment to the number of arguments, nin = nargs. This works when it is used with a function. However, I don't manage to set nin when using vectorize with a method created with

Re: [Numpy-discussion] vectorize in new.instancemethod and *args

2008-09-26 Thread joep
On Sep 26, 11:35 am, joep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a question about the use of vectorize in new.instancemethod: # case D: class with vectorize with nin adjustment - broken # nin is not correctly used by vectorize class D(object):     def __init__(self):         # define

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.hypergeometric - strange results

2008-10-02 Thread joep
should have good and bad reversed, i.e. {{{ 806 if (bad good) Z = m - Z; }}} Can you verify this? I never tried to build numpy from source. Josef On Sep 25, 4:18 pm, joep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my fuzz testing of scipy stats, I get sometimes a test failure. I think there is something

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.random.logseries - incorrect convergence for k=1, k=2

2008-10-02 Thread joep
27, 2:12 pm, joep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: random numbers generated by numpy.random.logseries do not converge to theoretical distribution: for probability paramater pr = 0.8, the random number generator converges to a frequency for k=1 at 39.8 %, while the theoretical probability mass

[Numpy-discussion] converting nan to an integer

2008-10-04 Thread joep
Why does converting nan to an integer not throw an exception (as with inf), instead numpy silently replaces nan by zero? inti = np.array([0,1,2]) inti.dtype dtype('int32') inti[1] = np.inf Traceback (most recent call last): File pyshell#34, line 1, in ? inti[1] = np.inf OverflowError:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combinations of objects (?)

2008-10-20 Thread joep
On Oct 20, 11:02 am, Andrea Gavana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote: On 10/20/2008 5:20 AM Andrea Gavana apparently wrote:     this is probably a very silly question, but combinatorial math is not exactly my strength and I am not

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Octave-numpy bridge?

2008-10-21 Thread joep
On Oct 20, 11:30 pm, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ravi wrote: Hi all,   Is anyone aware of a bridge between octave numpy? As I port stuff from Matlab to numpy, I noticed that most of my Matlab code has workarounds that allow the code to be used from octave. My current