Hello,
I noticed the change regarding nan function and especially nansum function. I
think this choice is a big mistake. I know that Matlab and R have made this
choice but it is illogical and counterintuitive.
First argument is about logic. An arithmetic operation between Nothing and
Nothing
I saw this thread and I totally disagree with thouis argument…
Of course, you can have NaN if there are only NaNs. Thanks goodness, There is a
lot of way to do that.
But it’s not convenient, consistent and above all, it is wrong logically to do
that. NaN does not mean zeros and operation with
gt; np.nansum([np.nan, 1]) # one
>
> If you want to propagate masks and such, use masked arrays.
> Ben Root
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Charles Rilhac <webmastert...@gmail.com
> <mailto:webmastert...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed t
