By the way, this is not bad at all in the absence of the actual
documentation http://devdocs.io/numpy~1.12/
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
> In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so
> that people can see that this is an open i
In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so
that people can see that this is an open issue? As we close them they
disappear from the issues tab on Github
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
> wro
On the last item, do we really have to follow that strange, `d`,`g` and so
on conventions on formatting? With all respect to the humongous historical
baggage, I think that notation is pretty archaic and terminal like. If
being pythonic is of a concern here, maybe it is better to use a more
verbose
I've indeed opened an issue for this :
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8090 . Recently, I've included the
LAPACK routines into SciPy dev version that will come with version 0.19.
Then you can use ?GECON, ?POCON and other ?XXCON routines for yourself or
wait a bit more until I have time to imp
n Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that's precisely the case but when we know the structure we can
> just choose the appropriate solver anyhow with a little bit of overhead.
> What I me
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
>
> > So every test in the polyalgorithm is cheaper than the next one. I'm not
> exactly sure what might be the best strategy yet hence the question. It's
> really interesting that LAPACK doesn't have th
at LAPACK doesn't have this type of fast checks.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:30 PM, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Ilhan Polat wrote:
>
>> > Note that you're proposing a new scipy feature (right?) on the numpy
>> list
>>
>> > Thi
> Note that you're proposing a new scipy feature (right?) on the numpy
list
> This sounds like a good idea to me. As a former heavy Matlab user I
remember a lot of things to dislike, but "\" behavior was quite nice.
Correct, I am not sure where this might go in. It seemed like a NumPy array
o
Hi everyone,
I was stalking the deprecating the numpy.matrix discussion on the other
thread and I wondered maybe the mailing list is a better place for the
discussion about something I've been meaning to ask the dev members. I
thought mailing lists are something we dumped using together with ICQ a
