Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.12.0b1 released

; > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 9:30 AM Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> >> I have a related question to Matti's, >> >> Do you have any recommendations for building standard wheels >> for 3rd party Python libraries which use both the NumPy Pytho

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.12.0b1 released

I have a related question to Matti's, Do you have any recommendations for building standard wheels for 3rd party Python libraries which use both the NumPy Python and C API? e.g. Do we need to do anything special given the NumPy C API itself is versioned? Does it matter compiler chain should we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Integers to integer powers, let's make a decision

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> ... >> >> It looks to me like users want floats, while developers want the >> easy path of raising an error. Darn those users, they

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Robert T. McGibbon <rmcgi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I sus

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Robert T. McGibbon wrote: > I suspect that many of the maintainers of major scipy-ecosystem projects are > aware of these (or other similar) travis wheel caches, but would guess that > the pool of travis-ci python users who weren't aware of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Mar 24, 2016 8:04 AM, "Peter Cock" <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Nathaniel, >> >> Will you be providing portable Linux wheels aka manylinux1? >> http

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

Hi Nathaniel, Will you be providing portable Linux wheels aka manylinux1? https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/ Does this also open up the door to releasing wheels for SciPy too? While speeding up "pip install" would be of benefit in itself, I am particularly keen to see this for use within

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal: stop providing official win32 downloads (for now)

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm wondering what people think of the idea of us (= numpy) stopping > providing our "official" win32 builds (the "superpack installers" > distributed on sourceforge) starting with the next release. > > These

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Verify your sourceforge windows installer downloads

Migrating from SourceForge seems worth considering. I also agree this is a breach of trust with the open source community. It is my impression that the GIMP team stopped using SF for downloads some time ago in favour of using their own website, leaving the SF account live to maintain the old

Re: [Numpy-discussion] cPickle.loads and Numeric

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Alexander Belopolsky ndar...@mac.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote: I seem to recall reading somewhere that pickles are not intended to be long-term archives as there is no guarantee that a pickle made in one

Re: [Numpy-discussion] De Bruijn sequence

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Vincent Davis vinc...@vincentdavis.net wrote: I happen to be working with De Bruijn sequences. Is there any interest in this being part of numpy/scipy?

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removal of numarray and oldnumeric packages.

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Peter Cock wrote: Hi Chuck, Could you clarify how we'd know if this is a problem in a large package? i.e. Is it just

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removal of numarray and oldnumeric packages.

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I have gotten no feedback on the removal of the numarray and oldnumeric packages. Consequently the removal will take place on 9/28. Scream now or never... Chuck Hi Chuck, Could you clarify how we'd

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Binary releases

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Why not just release numpy 1.8 with the old and terrible system? As you know I'm 110% in favor of getting rid of it, but 1.8 is ready to go and 1.9 is coming soon enough, and the old and terrible system does work right

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removal of beta and rc files from Sourceforge

On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: Hi All, Currently the beta and rc files for numpy versions = 1.6.1 are still up on sourceforge. I think at this point they

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Reading footer lines

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Resmi l.re...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've a list of long files of numerical data ending with footer lines (beginning with #). I am using numpy.loadtxt to read the numbers, and loadtxt ignores these footer lines. I want the numpy code to read one of the footer

Re: [Numpy-discussion] multivariate_normal issue with 'size' argument

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Emanuele Olivetti emanu...@relativita.com wrote: Interesting. Anyone able to reproduce what I observe? Emanuele Yes, I can reproduce this IndexError under Mac OS X: $ which python2.7 /usr/bin/python2.7 $ python2.7 Python 2.7.2 (default, Oct 11 2012, 20:14:37)

Re: [Numpy-discussion] multivariate_normal issue with 'size' argument

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Emanuele Olivetti emanu...@relativita.com wrote: Interesting. Anyone able to reproduce what I observe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.scipy.org page 404s

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Christopher Hanley chan...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Numpy Webmasters, Would it be possible to either redirect numpy.scipy.org to www.numpy.org or to the main numpy github landing page?

[Numpy-discussion] numpy.scipy.org giving 404 error

Hello all, http://numpy.scipy.org is giving a GitHub 404 error. As this used to be a widely used URL for the project, and likely appears in many printed references, could it be fixed to point to or redirect to the (relatively new) http://www.numpy.org site please? Thanks, Peter

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Seeking help and support for next-gen math modeling tools using Python

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking at documentation now, but a couple things from what I seen: Are you particularly tied to sourceforge? It seems a lot of python development is moving to github, and it makes third party contribution much easier. You

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Seeking help and support for next-gen math modeling tools using Python

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Robert Kern wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Peter Cock wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Todd wrote: I am looking at documentation now, but a couple things from what I seen: Are you particularly tied to sourceforge? It seems a lot of python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Will numpy 1.7.0 final be binary compatible with the rc?

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello all, Will the numpy 1.7.0 'final' be binary compatible

[Numpy-discussion] Will numpy 1.7.0 final be binary compatible with the rc?

Hello all, Will the numpy 1.7.0 'final' be binary compatible with the release candidate(s)? i.e. Would it be safe for me to release a Windows installer for a package using the NumPy C API compiled against the NumPy 1.7.0rc? I'm specifically interested in Python 3.3, and NumPy 1.7 will be the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building Numpy 1.6.2 for Python 3.3 on Windows

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:56 PM, klo klo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I run `python3 setup.py config` and then python3 setup.py build --compiler=mingw32 but it picks that I have MSVC 10 and complains about manifests. Why, or even better, how to compile with available MinGW compilers? I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Do we want scalar casting to behave as it does at the moment?

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 01/04/2013 12:39 AM, Andrew Collette wrote: Nathaniel Smith wrote: Consensus in that bug report seems to be that for array/scalar operations like: np.array([1], dtype=np.int8) + 1000 # can't be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Do we want scalar casting to behave as it does at the moment?

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Since I've actually used NumPy arrays with specific low memory types, I thought I should comment about my use case if case it is helpful: I've only used the low precision types like np.uint8 (unsigned) where I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Do we want scalar casting to behave as it does at the moment?

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On 4 Jan 2013 00:39, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: I agree with Dag rather than Andrew, Explicit is better than implicit. i.e. What Nathaniel described earlier as the apparent consensus. Since I've actually

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy on Travis with Python 3

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Thomas Robitaille thomas.robitai...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I'm currently having issues with installing Numpy 1.6.2 with Python 3.1 and 3.2 using pip in Travis builds - see for example: https://travis-ci.org/astropy/astropy/jobs/3379866 The build

Re: [Numpy-discussion] In case anybody wants them: py4science.* domains...

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Anthony Scopatz scop...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Perhaps http://numfocus.org/ could take them on, or the PSF

Re: [Numpy-discussion] In case anybody wants them: py4science.* domains...

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, years ago, John Hunter and I bought the py4science.{com, org, info} domains thinking they might be useful. We never did anything with them, and with his passing I realized I'm not really in the mood to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3 with MSVC 2010

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: On 11/16/2012 1:28 AM, Peter Cock wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: Naturally the file would be named msvc10compiler.py but the name may be kept for compatibility reasons

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3 with MSVC 2010

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: Naturally the file would be named msvc10compiler.py but the name may be kept for compatibility reasons. AFAIK msvc10 does not use manifests any longer for the CRT dependencies and all the code handling msvc9 manifests

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3 with MSVC 2010

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote: ... RuntimeError: Broken toolchain: cannot link a simple C program It appears a similar issue was raised before: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-June/062866.html Any tips? Peter Try changing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.7.0 release

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Here is a list of issues that need to be fixed before the release: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?milestone=3state=open

[Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3 with MSVC 2010

Changing title to reflect the fact this thread is now about using the Microsoft compiler rather than mingw32 as in the old thread. On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Those changes look correct, a PR would be great. I'll do that later this week - but feel free to do it yourself immediately if more

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: ... Found executable C:\cygwin\usr\bin\gcc.exe g++ -mno-cygwin _configtest.o -lmsvcr100 -o _configtest.exe Could not locate executable g++ Executable g++ does not exist A C++ compiler shouldn't be needed for numpy,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: I've not yet run the numpy tests yet, but I think this means my github branches are worth merging: https://github.com/peterjc/numpy/commits/msvc10 Hi Ralf, Pull request filed, assuming this gets applied

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Those changes look correct, a PR would be great. I'll do that later this week - but feel free to do it yourself immediately if more convenient. Fixing the next error also seems straightforward; around line 465 of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Dear all, Since the NumPy 1.7.0b2 release didn't include a Windows (32 bit) installer for Python 3.3, I am considering compiling

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Peter Cock wrote: Dear all, Since the NumPy 1.7.0b2 release didn't include a Windows (32 bit) installer for Python 3.3, I am considering compiling it myself for local testing. What

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

I meant to click on save not send, anyway: On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: Either MSVC or MinGW 3.4.5. For the latter see https://github.com/certik/numpy-vendor Ralf I was trying with mingw32 via cygwin with gcc 2.4.4, Typo, gcc 3.4.4 which

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote: I think part of the problem could be in numpy/distutils/misc_util.py where there is no code to detect MSCV 10, def msvc_runtime_library(): Return name of MSVC runtime library if Python was built with MSVC = 7

[Numpy-discussion] Compiling NumPy on Windows for Python 3.3

Dear all, Since the NumPy 1.7.0b2 release didn't include a Windows (32 bit) installer for Python 3.3, I am considering compiling it myself for local testing. What compiler is recommended? Thanks, Peter ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list