[Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

2017-03-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, The server for the scipy.org mailing list is in very bad shape, so we (led by Didrik Pinte) are planning to complete the migration of active mailing lists to the python.org infrastructure and to decommission the lists than seem dormant/obsolete. The scipy-user mailing list was already

Re: [Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

2017-03-23 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > Are you sure about astropy? They recently moved to google groups. https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/astropy/ shows messages as recent as today. So I'm sure I think (but happy to be corrected if moving to python.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

2017-03-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Has anyone taken care of notifying gmane about this? > We will have to update this info in quite a few places after the move is done. Including Gmane, although that site hasn't been working for half a year so is pretty

Re: [Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

2017-03-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
(and now with Didrik on Cc - apologies) On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The server for the scipy.org mailing list is in very bad shape, so we > (led by Didrik Pinte) are planning to complete the migration of acti

[Numpy-discussion] migration of all scipy.org mailing lists

2017-03-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, The server for the scipy.org mailing list is in very bad shape, so we (led by Didrik Pinte) are planning to complete the migration of active mailing lists to the python.org infrastructure and to decommission the lists than seem dormant/obsolete. The scipy-user mailing list was already

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 > hours: > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439 > > This has happened before: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] docs.scipy.org down

2017-03-13 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Ryan May wrote: > Is https://docs.scipy.org/ being down known issue? > It is. Is being worked on; tracking issue is https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779 Thanks for reporting, Ralf ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Daily numpy wheel builds - prefer to per-commit builds?

2017-02-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working to get daily travis-ci cron-job manylinux builds > working for numpy and scipy wheels. They are now working OK: > > https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/numpy-wheels >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Could we simplify backporting?

2017-02-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > In gh-8594, a question came up how to mark things that should be > backported and Chuck commented [1]: > > > Our backport policy is still somewhat ad hoc, especially as I the only > one who has

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Development Queries

2017-02-20 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:32 AM, ashwin.pathak < ashwin.pat...@students.iiit.ac.in> wrote: > Hello all, > I am new to this organization and wanted to start with some easy-fix > issues to get some knowledge about the soruce code. However, the issues > under easy-fix labels have already been solved

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Eric Wieser added to NumPy team.

2017-02-19 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm pleased to welcome Eric to the NumPy team. There is a pile of pending > PRs that grows every day and we are counting on Eric will help us keep it > in check ;) > Welcome to the team Eric!

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

2017-02-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some > > links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for open source > > projects, if they agree to a submitted request: > > The debian project has some

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

2017-02-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > &g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

2017-02-15 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > &g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

2017-02-15 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hey, > > A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some > links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for open source > projects, if they agree to a submitted request: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building external c modules with mingw64 / numpy

2017-02-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Schnizer, Pierre < pierre.schni...@helmholtz-berlin.de> wrote: > Dear all, > > > >I built an external c-module (pygsl) using mingw 64 from > msys2 mingw64-gcc compiler. > > > > This built required some changes to numpy.distutils to get the > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Marten van Kerkwijk added to numpy team.

2017-02-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm pleased to welcome Marten to the numpy team. His reviews of PRs have > been very useful in the past and I am happy that he has accepted our > invitation to join the team. > Excellent, welcome

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC 2017: NumFocus will be an umbrella organization

2017-01-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi Max, On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Max Linke wrote: > Hi > > Organizations can start submitting applications for Google Summer of Code > 2017 on January 19 (and the deadline is February 9) > > https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline?hl=en Thanks for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.12.0 release

2017-01-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm pleased to announce the NumPy 1.12.0 release. This release supports > Python 2.7 and 3.4-3.6. Wheels for all supported Python versions may be > downloaded from PiPY >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Backslash operator A\b and np/sp.linalg.solve

2017-01-09 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Ilhan Polat wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I was stalking the deprecating the numpy.matrix discussion on the other > thread and I wondered maybe the mailing list is a better place for the > discussion about something I've been meaning to ask the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 5:31 PM, CJ Carey > wrote: > >> I agree with Ralf; coupling these changes to sparse is a bad idea. >> >> I think that scipy.sparse will be an important

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charle

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> It looks to me like we're getting a bit off track here. The sparse >> ma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Todd <toddr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 6, 2017 20:28, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:21 PM, CJ Carey <perimosocord...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >&g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > It seems there are two steps that can be taken now and are needed no > matter what: > > 1. Add numpy documentation describing the preferred way to handle > matrices, extolling the virtues of @,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:37 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> >&

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:21 PM, CJ Carey <perimosocord...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> This sounds like a reasonable idea. Timeline could be something like: >> >> 1. Now: creat

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote: > There's a good chance that bokeh.charts will be split off into a > separately distributed package as well. Hopefully being a much smaller, > pure Python project makes it a more accessible target for anyone interested

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating matrices.

2017-01-02 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Just throwing this click bait out for discussion. Now that the `@` > operator is available and things seem to be moving towards Python 3, > especially in the classroom, we should consider the real

Re: [Numpy-discussion] script for building numpy from source in virtualenv and outside it

2016-12-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Felipe Vieira wrote: > Dear fellows, > > I'm struggling with a single script to build numpy from source in a > virtual env. I want the same script to be able to be run with a normal env. > > So if ran from a normal env it should affect all

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PyPy wheels (was: NumPy 1.12.0b1 released)

2016-11-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Nov 18, 2016 3:30 PM, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >

[Numpy-discussion] PyPy wheels (was: NumPy 1.12.0b1 released)

2016-11-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
Arguments1_funcrun_obj File "pypy_module_cpyext_4.c", line 16627, in generic_cpy_call__StdObjSpaceConst_funcPtr_SomeI_17 Fatal RPython error: AssertionError Abort trap: 6 So guess I'll go find out where that issue tracker is:) Ralf On Nov 18, 2016 01:14, "Ralf Gommers"

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.12.0b1 released

2016-11-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Matti Picus > wrote: > > Congrats to all on the release.Two questions: > > > > Is there a guide to building standard wheels for NumPy? > > I don't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status of NAs for integer arrays

2016-11-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Dmitrii Izgurskii wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know where I can follow the progress of what's being done > on implementing missing values in integer arrays. Some threads I found are > from 2012. Is really nothing being done on this issue?

Re: [Numpy-discussion] __numpy_ufunc__

2016-11-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > I'm interested in this, but was never able to dive in to the lengthy > discussions on this. I'm curious if there is a summary of the current > state of things somewhere that I could read to catch up. Old proposal,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] __numpy_ufunc__

2016-11-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> For those interested in continuing the __numpy_ufunc__ saga, there is a pull >> request enabling it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Branching NumPy 1.12.x

2016-11-04 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm thinking that it is time to branch NumPy 1.12.x. I haven't got > everything in it that I would have liked, in particular __numpy_ufunc__, > but I think there is plenty of material and not

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Intel random number package

2016-10-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Pavlyk, Oleksandr < oleksandr.pav...@intel.com> wrote: > Please see responses inline. > > > > *From:* NumPy-Discussion [mailto:numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org] *On > Behalf Of *Todd > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:04 PM > *To:* Discussion of Numerical

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Intel random number package

2016-10-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 26.10.2016 06:34, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > There is a proposed random number package PR now up on github: > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/8209. It is from > > oleksandr-pavlyk

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy installation on Window with mingw32

2016-10-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi, A few comments: - you really really want to use a scientific Python distribution to avoid these issues on Windows. see http://scipy.org/install.html - we used to build scipy .exe installers with mingw32 but don't do that anymore because it's just too much of a pain. IIRC the last release we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Integers to negative integer powers, time for a decision.

2016-10-09 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Charles R

Re: [Numpy-discussion] update on mailing list issues

2016-10-04 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We've had a number of issues with the reliability of the mailman setup > > that powers the mailing lists for NumPy, SciPy and several other &

[Numpy-discussion] update on mailing list issues

2016-10-04 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, We've had a number of issues with the reliability of the mailman setup that powers the mailing lists for NumPy, SciPy and several other projects. To address that we'll start migrating to the python.org provided infrastructure, which should be much more reliable. The full set of lists is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Vendorize tempita

2016-09-30 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On

[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: [NumFOCUS Projects] Job Posting

2016-09-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, The below job posting may be of interest. It's actually a key role for a quite exciting program, could really have an impact on a large set of scientific computing projects. Cheers, Ralf -- Forwarded message -- From: Leah Silen Date: Thu, Sep 22,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] mail.scipy.org update

2016-09-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Didrik Pinte wrote: > If all the SSL certification updates have been done properly, this message > should go through. > It did, thanks Didrik! Ralf > > -- Didrik > > On 14 September 2016 at 13:00, Didrik Pinte

Re: [Numpy-discussion] weighted random choice in Python

2016-08-16 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Alan Isaac wrote: > It seems that there may soon be movement on this enhancement request: > http://bugs.python.org/issue18844 > The API is currently under discussion. > If this decision might interact with NumPy in any way, > it would be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy in PyPy

2016-08-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Don't know if it is what you are looking for, but NumPy has a built-in > suite of benchmarks: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/ > numpy.testing.Tester.bench.html > That's the very old (now unused)

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Euroscipy

2016-08-03 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > Hi all, > > I am still pondering whether or not (and if which days) to go to > EuroScipy. Who else is there and would like to discuss a bit or > whatever else? > Unfortunately I'm not able to go this year. Ralf

Re: [Numpy-discussion] runtests.py fails f2py test

2016-07-19 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Matti Picus wrote: > Am I missing something simple? I > - install git, subversion, gcc, gfortran (Ubuntu 16.04) > - create a clean python2 virtual env (no numpy) > - activate it > - git clone numpy > - cd into it > - python runtests.py > -

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Performance issue in covariance function in Numpy 1.9 and later

2016-07-19 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ecem sogancıoglu wrote: > Hello All, > > there seems to be a performance issue with the covariance function in > numpy 1.9 and later. > > Code example: > *np.cov(np.random.randn(700,37000))* > > In numpy 1.8, this line of code requires

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Custom Dtype/Units discussion

2016-07-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > > > http://www.continuum.io > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Chris Barker >> wrote: >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Remove FCompiler flags?

2016-07-07 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Rob Nagler wrote: > I would like to remove "-fno-second-underscore" and "-Wall" from the > fcompiler. I had hacked a build_clib subclass to remove the flags > dynamically, but that is fragile (and is now broken). Is there a right way > to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Added atleast_nd, request for clarification/cleanup of atleast_3d

2016-07-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: On Jul 5, 2016 11:21 PM, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Added atleast_nd, request for clarification/cleanup of atleast_3d

2016-07-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Jul 5, 2016 9:09 PM, "Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz" > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have generalized np.atleast_1d, np.atleast_2d, np.atleast_3d with a > > function np.atleast_nd in PR#7804 > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] f2py output module name

2016-07-05 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:18 PM, klo uo wrote: > Hi, I'm following this guide: > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/f2py/getting-started.html#the-quick-and-smart-way > > I'm on Windows with gfortran and VS2015. When I run: > > f2py -c -m fib3 fib3.f > > as output I dont get

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Accelerate or OpenBLAS for numpy / scipy wheels?

2016-07-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Sturla Molden <sturla.mol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > For most routines performance seems to be comparable, and both are much > > better than ATLAS. When there's a significant differe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is numpy.test() supposed to be multithreaded?

2016-06-29 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > > >> Now the user is writing back to say, "my test code is fast now, but >> numpy.test() is still about three times slower than > don't manage>". When I watch htop as numpy.test() executes, sure

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is numpy.test() supposed to be multithreaded?

2016-06-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Michael Ward wrote: > Heya, I'm not a numbers guy, but I maintain servers for scientists and > researchers who are. Someone pointed out that our numpy installation on a > particular server was only using one core. I'm unaware of the who/how

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Accelerate or OpenBLAS for numpy / scipy wheels?

2016-06-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > > > > > > This doesn't really matter too much imho, we have to support Accelerate >> > either way. >> > > do we? -- so if we go OpenBlas, and someone want to do a simple build from > source, what happens? Do they get

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Accelerate or OpenBLAS for numpy / scipy wheels?

2016-06-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Pip download stats for numpy

2016-06-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > I just ran a query on pypi downloads [1] using the BigQuery interface > to pypi stats [2]. It lists the numpy files downloaded from pypi via > a pip install, over the last two weeks, ordered by the number

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Deprecating silent truncation of floats when assigned to int array

2016-06-17 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Ian Henriksen < insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally, I think this is a great idea. +1 to more informative errors. > +1 from me as well Ralf > Best, > Ian Henriksen > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:11 PM Nathaniel Smith

Re: [Numpy-discussion] scipy.stats.qqplot and scipy.stats.probplot axis labeling

2016-06-12 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Note that the scipy-dev or scipy-user mailing list would have been more > appropriate for this question. > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Mark Gawron &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy lesson at EuroScipy2016?

2016-06-11 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:25 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently I taught "Advanced NumPy" lesson at a Software Carpentry workshop > [1]. It covered a review of basic operations on numpy arrays and also more > advanced topics: indexing, broadcasting, dtypes and memory layout. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] scipy.stats.qqplot and scipy.stats.probplot axis labeling

2016-06-11 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi Mark, Note that the scipy-dev or scipy-user mailing list would have been more appropriate for this question. On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Mark Gawron wrote: > > > The scipy.stats.qqplot and scipy.stats.probplot functions plot expected > values versus actual data

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.11 docs

2016-05-29 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote: > These still are missing from the SciPy.org page, several months after the > release. > Thanks Stephan, that needs fixing. > > What do we need to do to keep these updated? >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Numpy 1.11.1rc1 release

2016-05-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I am pleased to announce the release of Numpy 1.11.1rc1. > Thanks Chuck! > The sources may be found on sourceforge > and > wheels

Re: [Numpy-discussion] axis parameter for count_nonzero

2016-05-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 3:05 AM, G Young wrote: > Hi, > > I have had a PR open (first > draft can be found here ) for > quite some time now that adds an 'axis' parameter to *count_nonzero*.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] linux wheels coming soon

2016-03-24 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Peter Cock wrote: > Hi Nathaniel, > > Will you be providing portable Linux wheels aka manylinux1? > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/ > > Does this also open up the door to releasing wheels for SciPy > too? > That should work

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PyData Madrid

2016-02-20 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > On Mi, 2016-02-17 at 20:59 +0100, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just found out there is a PyData Madrid happening in early April, > > and it would feel wrong not to go, it being my

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numexpr-3.0 proposal

2016-02-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Robert McLeod wrote: > > 4.) I took a stab at converting from distutils to setuputils but this > seems challenging with numpy as a dependency. I wonder if anyone has tried > monkey-patching so that setup.py build_ext uses distutils and then

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Suggestion: special-case np.array(range(...)) to be faster

2016-02-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Antony Lee <antony@

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: numpydoc 0.6.0 released

2016-02-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:38 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm pleased to announce the release of numpydoc 0.6.0. The main new >> featu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Suggestion: special-case np.array(range(...)) to be faster

2016-02-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Antony Lee wrote: > re: no reason why... > This has nothing to do with Python2/Python3 (I personally stopped using > Python2 at least 3 years ago.) Let me put it this way instead: if > Python3's "range" (or Python2's "xrange") was not a

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: numpydoc 0.6.0 released

2016-02-13 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the release of numpydoc 0.6.0. The main new feature is support for the Yields section in numpy-style docstrings. This is described in https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/doc/HOWTO_DOCUMENT.rst.txt Numpydoc can be installed from PyPi:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

2016-02-10 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > As you can see in the timeline: > > https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline > > We are now in the stage where mentoring organizations are getting their > act together. So the question now is -- are there

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

2016-02-10 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > Thanks Ralf, > > Note that we have always done a combined numpy/scipy ideas page and >> submission. For really good students numpy may be the right challenge, but >> in general scipy is easier to get started on. >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC?

2016-02-10 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> > wrote: > >> Thanks Ralf, >> >> Note that we have always done a combined numpy/scipy ideas page

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

2016-02-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 01/30/2016 06:27 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com > > <mailto:n...@pobox.com>> wro

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

2016-01-30 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > It occurs to me that the best solution might be to put together a > .travis.yml for the release branches that does: "for pkg in > IMPORTANT_PACKAGES: pip install $pkg; python -c 'import pkg; pkg.test()'" > This might not

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

2016-01-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Jan 28, 2016 3:25 PM, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

2016-01-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Charles R Harris > > <charlesr.har...@gmail.c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.11.0b2 released

2016-01-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> Maybe we should upload to pypi? This allows us to upload binaries for osx >> at least, and in general will make the beta

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bump warning stacklevel

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02 PM, sebastian <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On 2016-01-27 21:01, Ralf Gommers wrote: > >> >> One issue will be how to keep this consistent. `stacklevel` is used so >> rarely that new PRs will always omit it for new warnings

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bump warning stacklevel

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > Hi all, > > in my PR about warnings suppression, I currently also have a commit > which bumps the warning stacklevel to two (or three), i.e. use: > > warnings.warn(..., stacklevel=2) > > (almost) everywhere.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Numpy 1.11.0b1 is out

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building Numpy with OpenBLAS

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:19 PM, G Young wrote: > NumPy will "build" successfully, but then when I type "import numpy", it > cannot import the multiarray PYD file. > > I am using dependency walker, and that's how I know it's the > libopenblas.dll file that it's not linking

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building Numpy with OpenBLAS

2016-01-27 Thread Ralf Gommers
eciated by the way. Updating the build info on all platforms on http://scipy.org/scipylib/building/index.html is a significant amount of work, and it has never been in a state one could call complete. So more contributions definitely welcome! Ralf > > Greg > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Appveyor Testing Changes

2016-01-26 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:13 AM, G Young wrote: > Ah, yes, that is true. That point had completely escaped my mind. In > light of this, it seems that it's not worth the while then to completely > switch over to pip + virtualenv. It's might be better actually to rewrite >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Should I use pip install numpy in linux?

2016-01-19 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > > > 2) continue to support those users fairly poorly, and at substantial > > ongoing cost > > I'm curious what the cost is for this poor support -- throw the source > up on PyPi, and we're done. The

[Numpy-discussion] building with setuptools

2016-01-18 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, We've been able to hold out for a long time, but this is to let you all know that we have now had to switch the numpy build to rely on setuptools: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/6895. Main reason: plain distutils doesn't support PEP 440 naming. See

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows build/distribute plan & MingwPy funding

2016-01-09 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Erik Bray <erik.m.bray+nu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> The failed tests require pyrex, fortran, and swig. The refcount err

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-05 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > The failed tests require pyrex, fortran, and swig. The refcount error > comes and goes, probably the test isn't very good. Ralf, is there any > reason to keep the various extension building tests? They are

[Numpy-discussion] Windows build/distribute plan & MingwPy funding

2016-01-02 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, You probably know that building Numpy, Scipy and the rest of the Scipy Stack on Windows is problematic. And that there are plans to adopt the static MinGW-w64 based toolchain that Carl Kleffner has done a lot of work on for the last two years to fix that situation. The good news is: this

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy funding update

2016-01-02 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > A quick good news message: OSDC has made a $5k contribution to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] random integers

2015-12-30 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I've implemented several new random integer functions in #6910 > , to wit > > >- np.random.random_int32 >- np.random.random_int64 >-

[Numpy-discussion] Numpy funding update

2015-12-30 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, A quick good news message: OSDC has made a $5k contribution to NumFOCUS, which is split between support for a women in technology workshop and support for Numpy: http://www.numfocus.org/blog/osdc-donates-5k-to-support-numpy-women-in-tech This was a very nice surprise to me, and a first

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >