Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Jan 26, 2008 1:05 AM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles R Harris wrote: On Jan 25, 2008 11:30 PM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles R Harris wrote: snip It varies with the Linux distro. The usual

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Jan 25, 2008 11:30 PM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles R Harris wrote: snip It varies with the Linux distro. The usual convention (LSB, I think) uses /usr/local/lib64, but Debian and distros derived from Debian use /usr/local/lib instead. That's how it was the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-26 Thread David Cournapeau
Charles R Harris wrote: On Jan 25, 2008 11:30 PM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles R Harris wrote: snip It varies with the Linux distro. The usual convention (LSB, I think) uses /usr/local/lib64, but Debian and distros

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread dmitrey
Hi all, I don't know much about what are these scons are, if it's something essential (as it seems to be from amount of mailing list traffic) why can't it be just merged to numpy, w/o making any additional branches? Regards, D. David Cournapeau wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread Robert Kern
dmitrey wrote: Hi all, I don't know much about what are these scons are, if it's something essential (as it seems to be from amount of mailing list traffic) why can't it be just merged to numpy, w/o making any additional branches? It's a very large, still experimental change to the entire

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread Matthieu Brucher
2008/1/25, dmitrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, I don't know much about what are these scons are, if it's something essential (as it seems to be from amount of mailing list traffic) why can't it be just merged to numpy, w/o making any additional branches? Scons is a building system, like

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread David Cournapeau
dmitrey wrote: Hi all, I don't know much about what are these scons are, if it's something essential (as it seems to be from amount of mailing list traffic) why can't it be just merged to numpy, w/o making any additional branches? scons is a build system, like make. The difference being that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread David Cournapeau
Matthew Brett wrote: Hi David, Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discovery, linking steps - ATLAS in particular. Don't trust the included doc: it is not up-to-date, and that's the part which I totally redesigned since I wrote the initial doc. - For a perflib check to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, I've attached the build logs. I noticed that, for atlas, you check for atlas_enum.c - but do you in fact need this for the build? Now. I just wanted one header specific to atlas. It looks like not all version of ATLAS install this one, unfortunately (3.8, for example).

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread David Cournapeau
Neal Becker wrote: Is numscons specific to numpy/scipy, or is it for building arbitrary python extensions (replacing distutils?). I'm hoping for the latter. Actually, another way to answer your question: I am working on a patch such as the part of numscons which takes care of building python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread David Cournapeau
Charles R Harris wrote: On Jan 25, 2008 3:21 AM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Brett wrote: Hi David, Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discovery, linking steps - ATLAS in particular. Don't trust

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-25 Thread Charles R Harris
On Jan 25, 2008 3:21 AM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Brett wrote: Hi David, Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discovery, linking steps - ATLAS in particular. Don't trust the included doc: it is not up-to-date, and that's the part which I totally

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-24 Thread Stefan van der Walt
Hi David On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:34:56AM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: I've just released the 0.3.0 release of numscons, an alternative build system for numpy. The tarballs are available on launchpad. https://launchpad.net/numpy.scons.support/0.3/0.3.0 To use it, you need to get

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-24 Thread David Cournapeau
Matthew Brett wrote: Hi David, Thanks again for doing this. I've been playing with the compilation - should I email you direct with questions, to the lists? I don't think it would be inappropriate to use the current lists for that. Basically, I'm trying to understand the library discovery,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-24 Thread David Cournapeau
Stefan van der Walt wrote: Hi David On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:34:56AM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: I've just released the 0.3.0 release of numscons, an alternative build system for numpy. The tarballs are available on launchpad. https://launchpad.net/numpy.scons.support/0.3/0.3.0

[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] numscons 0.3.0 release

2008-01-23 Thread David Cournapeau
Hi, I've just released the 0.3.0 release of numscons, an alternative build system for numpy. The tarballs are available on launchpad. https://launchpad.net/numpy.scons.support/0.3/0.3.0 To use it, you need to get the build_with_scons numpy branch: see