Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-13 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Jarrod Millman mill...@berkeley.eduwrote:

 On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Ralf Gommers
 ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
  It would be good if we could also have one more merge of the work in the
 doc
  editor (close to 300 new/changed docstrings now). I can have it all
 reviewed
  by the 13th.

 That would be great.  Thanks for taking care of that.


All wiki changes are now reviewed and can be merged. Under numpy/doc there
is a file HOWTO_MERGE_WIKI_DOCS.txt with details on how this is done.

Cheers,
Ralf
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-13 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
 All wiki changes are now reviewed and can be merged. Under numpy/doc there
 is a file HOWTO_MERGE_WIKI_DOCS.txt with details on how this is done.

I checked in the majority of the doc changes, but there are some minor
problems with the remaining diffs.  I have to run now, but I will look
at it later today.

Thanks,

-- 
Jarrod Millman
Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute
10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley
http://cirl.berkeley.edu/
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-13 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Jarrod Millman mill...@berkeley.eduwrote:

 On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Ralf Gommers
 ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
  All wiki changes are now reviewed and can be merged. Under numpy/doc
 there
  is a file HOWTO_MERGE_WIKI_DOCS.txt with details on how this is done.

 I checked in the majority of the doc changes, but there are some minor
 problems with the remaining diffs.  I have to run now, but I will look
 at it later today.

 Thanks Jarrod.

With minor problems I assume you are talking about the error messages at the
top of the diff. Most of those are not terribly important items, some are
for things like constants for which only the html docs make sense anyway.

Cheers,
Ralf
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-04 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I think it is about time to release 1.4.0. Instead of proposing a
 release date, I am setting a firm date for 1st December, and 16th
 november to freeze the trunk. If someone wants a different date, you
 have to speak now.

 There are a few issues I would like to clear up:
  - Documentation for datetime, in particular for the public C API
  - Snow Leopard issues, if any

 Otherwise, I think there has been quite a lot of new features. If
 people want to add new functionalities or features, please do it soon,


It would be good if we could also have one more merge of the work in the doc
editor (close to 300 new/changed docstrings now). I can have it all reviewed
by the 13th.

Unless you object, I'd also like to include the distutils docs. Complete
docs with some possible minor inaccuracies is better than no docs.

Cheers,
Ralf
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-04 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
 It would be good if we could also have one more merge of the work in the doc
 editor (close to 300 new/changed docstrings now). I can have it all reviewed
 by the 13th.

That would be great.  Thanks for taking care of that.

 Unless you object, I'd also like to include the distutils docs. Complete
 docs with some possible minor inaccuracies is better than no docs.

+1

-- 
Jarrod Millman
Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute
10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley
http://cirl.berkeley.edu/
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-03 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Pauli Virtanen pav...@iki.fi wrote:


 Can we get the complex functions to npy_math for 1.4.0: could be useful
 for the next Scipy?

Ok, the complex math stuff is in the trunk now. I have not thoroughly
tested it again, but since I tested the former branch on most
platforms, any remaining issues should be quick to fix.

I hope you will be able to put your own tests in the trunk easily - I
mostly need to test this on windows, as that's the major platform
without any C99 complex support and which will exercise the code in
the branch.

cheers,

David
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


[Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-02 Thread David Cournapeau
Hi,

I think it is about time to release 1.4.0. Instead of proposing a
release date, I am setting a firm date for 1st December, and 16th
november to freeze the trunk. If someone wants a different date, you
have to speak now.

There are a few issues I would like to clear up:
 - Documentation for datetime, in particular for the public C API
 - Snow Leopard issues, if any

Otherwise, I think there has been quite a lot of new features. If
people want to add new functionalities or features, please do it soon,

cheers,

David
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-02 Thread Darren Dale
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:29 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I think it is about time to release 1.4.0. Instead of proposing a
 release date, I am setting a firm date for 1st December, and 16th
 november to freeze the trunk. If someone wants a different date, you
 have to speak now.

 There are a few issues I would like to clear up:
  - Documentation for datetime, in particular for the public C API
  - Snow Leopard issues, if any

 Otherwise, I think there has been quite a lot of new features. If
 people want to add new functionalities or features, please do it soon,

I wanted to get __input_prepare__ in for the 1.4 release, but I don't
think I can get it in and tested by November 16.

Darren
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-02 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:29:18 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
 I think it is about time to release 1.4.0. Instead of proposing a
 release date, I am setting a firm date for 1st December, and 16th
 november to freeze the trunk. If someone wants a different date, you
 have to speak now.
 
 There are a few issues I would like to clear up:
  - Documentation for datetime, in particular for the public C API
  - Snow Leopard issues, if any
 
 Otherwise, I think there has been quite a lot of new features. If people
 want to add new functionalities or features, please do it soon,

Can we get the complex functions to npy_math for 1.4.0: could be useful 
for the next Scipy? This is pretty quick to do, I can just write up some 
more tests one evening and commit.

-- 
Pauli Virtanen

___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:29 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I think it is about time to release 1.4.0. Instead of proposing a
 release date, I am setting a firm date for 1st December, and 16th
 november to freeze the trunk. If someone wants a different date, you
 have to speak now.

 There are a few issues I would like to clear up:
  - Documentation for datetime, in particular for the public C API
  - Snow Leopard issues, if any


It would be nice to track down the reduceat bug. Not that I've managed to
get myself working on the problem.

Chuck



___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.4.0: Setting a firm release date for 1st december.

2009-11-02 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Pauli Virtanen pav...@iki.fi wrote:


 Can we get the complex functions to npy_math for 1.4.0: could be useful
 for the next Scipy? This is pretty quick to do, I can just write up some
 more tests one evening and commit.

The idea was partially to set a date to force me putting my code in shape soon.

The whole point of setting release dates is to organize ones own time
around it, after all :)

David
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion