On 9/30/2013 8:17 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/ .The
binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which will
arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to those
This is a complicated issue to describe but i think the bottom line is that
the test is just wonky here. the behaviour it's checking for is:
wrong in old numpy, but we do it anyway (bug)
wrong in current numpy without RELAXED_STRIDES, and we get it right (I.e.
don't do it, fixed bug)
correct in
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:04 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
This is a complicated issue to describe but i think the bottom line is
that the test is just wonky here. the behaviour it's checking for is:
wrong in old numpy, but we do it anyway (bug)
wrong in current numpy without RELAXED_STRIDES,
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 12:54 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:04 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
This is a complicated issue to describe but i think the bottom line is
that the test is just wonky here. the behaviour it's checking for is:
wrong in old numpy, but we do it
Den 30-09-2013 17:17, Charles R Harris skrev:
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/ .The
binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which
will arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to
On 30 September 2013 17:17, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on
sourceforgehttp://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/.The
binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which
will arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for
Disregard that, I had not cleaned the previous installation properly.
Sorry for the noise.
On 1 October 2013 12:11, Daπid davidmen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 September 2013 17:17, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jens Jørgen Mortensen
je...@fysik.dtu.dk wrote:
I seems that solve() doesn't like arrays like zeros((3, 0)). I get this
with 1.8.0rc1 on Ubuntu 13.04 and Python 2.7.4:
Yep, looks like a simple bug in the new gufunc stuff, thanks for
catching it. Filed here:
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 12:00 +0200, Jens Jørgen Mortensen wrote:
Den 30-09-2013 17:17, Charles R Harris skrev:
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge .The binary builds are
included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which will arrive later.
Many thanks to Ralf for the
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on
sourceforgehttp://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/.The
binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which
will arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to those who
found and fixed the bugs in the last beta.
On 30.09.2013 17:17, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/ .The
binary builds are included except for Python 3.3 on windows, which will
arrive later. Many thanks to Ralf for the binaries, and to
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Julian Taylor
jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 30.09.2013 17:17, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
NumPy 1.8.0rc1 is up now on sourceforge
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0rc1/ .The
binary builds are included except for
12 matches
Mail list logo
