On Apr 1, 2015 12:55 PM, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río
> > wrote:
> >> This question on StackOverflow:
> >>
> >>
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29394377/minimum-of-numpy-array-ignoring-diagonal
>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río
> wrote:
>> This question on StackOverflow:
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29394377/minimum-of-numpy-array-ignoring-diagonal
>>
>> Got me thinking that I had finally found a
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río
wrote:
> This question on StackOverflow:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29394377/minimum-of-numpy-array-ignoring-diagonal
>
> Got me thinking that I had finally found a use for the 'where' kwarg of
> ufuncs. Unfortunately it is only
Another usecase would be for MaskedArrays. ma.masked_array.min() wouldn't
have to make a copy anymore (there is a github issue about that). It could
just pass its mask into the where= argument of min() and be done with it.
Problem would be generalizing situations where where= effectively results
in
This question on StackOverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29394377/minimum-of-numpy-array-ignoring-diagonal
Got me thinking that I had finally found a use for the 'where' kwarg of
ufuncs. Unfortunately it is only provided for the ufunc itself, but not for
any of its methods.
Is there an
