Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-02 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 9:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-02 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: To be clear, this subthread started with the caveat *as far as our officially supported platforms go* -- I'm not saying that we should go around and remove all the NPY_NO_EXPORT macros tomorrow. However, the only reason

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-01 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: But seriously, what compilers do we support that don't have -fvisibility=hidden? ...Is there even a list of compilers we support available

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-01 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: But seriously, what compilers do we support that don't have

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-01 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-07-01 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:36 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:05 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:

[Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more conventional route of first compiling each .c file to a .o file, and then linking those together. I gather from comments in the source code that the former is the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more conventional route of first compiling each .c file to a .o file, and then linking those

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building numpy: either by compiling a giant concatenated C file, or by the more

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: Currently the numpy build system(s) support two ways of building numpy:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 06/27/2012 09:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Combined versus separate build

2012-06-27 Thread David Cournapeau
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote: On 06/27/2012 09:53 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, David Cournapeaucourn...@gmail.com  wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Nathaniel Smithn...@pobox.com  wrote: On Wed, Jun