Re: [Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-12 Thread David Cournapeau
Pearu Peterson wrote: Yes. I was considering the situations where distutils in not used at all. May be it will be relevant in future.. If distutils is not used at all, there will be more difficult problems to solve than this one, then. I think it is safe to assume that distutils will stay

Re: [Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-11 Thread Pearu Peterson
Hi, Examples look good. It seems that you have lots of work ahead;) to add numpy.distutils features that are required to build numpy/scipy. Few comments: 1) Why SConstruct does not have extension? It looks like a python file and .py extension could be used. 2) It seems that scons does not

Re: [Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-11 Thread David Cournapeau
Pearu Peterson wrote: Hi, Examples look good. It seems that you have lots of work ahead;) to add numpy.distutils features that are required to build numpy/scipy. Hi Pearu, Thanks for reviewing this, especially since you are arguably the most knowledgeable about this part of numpy :)

Re: [Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-11 Thread Pearu Peterson
David Cournapeau wrote: Pearu Peterson wrote: 2) It seems that scons does not interfare with numpy.distutils much. If this is true and numpy/scipy builds will not break when scons is not installed then I think you could continue the scons support development in trunk. It won't break if

Re: [Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-11 Thread David Cournapeau
Pearu Peterson wrote: I think this is good. Does scons require python-dev? If not then this will solve one of the frequent issues that new users may experience: not installed distutils. Isn't distutils included in python library ? Anyway, scons does not require anything else than a python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-11 Thread Pearu Peterson
David Cournapeau wrote: Pearu Peterson wrote: I think this is good. Does scons require python-dev? If not then this will solve one of the frequent issues that new users may experience: not installed distutils. Isn't distutils included in python library ? Not always. For example, in debian

Re: [Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-11 Thread Robert Kern
Pearu Peterson wrote: David Cournapeau wrote: Pearu Peterson wrote: I think this is good. Does scons require python-dev? If not then this will solve one of the frequent issues that new users may experience: not installed distutils. Isn't distutils included in python library ? Not always.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-11 Thread David Cournapeau
Pearu Peterson wrote: Anyway, scons does not require anything else than a python interpreter. Actually, an explicit requirement of scons is to support any python starting at version 1.5.2 (this is another important point which I consider important for a replacement of numpy.distutils).

[Numpy-discussion] For review: first milestone of scons support in numpy

2007-10-10 Thread David Cournapeau
Hi, (if you are not interested in numpy developement, you can stop now :) ). Following the discussion a few days ago on using scons to build extensions in numpy, I have reached a somewhat usable milestone, in the numpy.scons branch of numpy, and would like to hear some comments,