There are several situations where that comes up (Like comparing two sparse
matrices A == B) There is a SparseEfficiancyWarning that can be thrown, but
the way this should be implemented still needs to be discussed. I will be
writing a specification on how ufuncs and ndarrays are handled by the
spa
On 1 May 2013 20:12, Blake Griffith wrote:
> However, it would still be useful to have ufuncs working well with the
> sparse package.
How are you planning to deal with ufunc(0) != 0? cos(sparse) is actually dense.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy
Oh wow, I just assumed that `dot` was a ufunc... However, it would still be
useful to have ufuncs working well with the sparse package. I don't
understand everything that is going on in
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_object.c
But I assumed that I would be abl
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 30.04.2013 22:37, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> How do you plan to go about this? The obvious option of just calling
>> scipy.sparse.issparse() on ufunc entry raises some problems, since
>> numpy can't depend on or even import scipy
30.04.2013 22:37, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti:
[clip]
> How do you plan to go about this? The obvious option of just calling
> scipy.sparse.issparse() on ufunc entry raises some problems, since
> numpy can't depend on or even import scipy, and we might be reluctant
> to add such a special case for wh
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Blake Griffith
> wrote:
> > Hello, I'm writing a GSoC proposal, mostly concerning SciPy, but it
> involves
> > a few changes to NumPy.
> > The proposal is titled: Improvements to the sparse package of Scip
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Blake Griffith
wrote:
> Hello, I'm writing a GSoC proposal, mostly concerning SciPy, but it involves
> a few changes to NumPy.
> The proposal is titled: Improvements to the sparse package of Scipy: support
> for bool dtype and better interaction with NumPy
> and ca
Hello, I'm writing a GSoC proposal, mostly concerning SciPy, but it
involves a few changes to NumPy.
The proposal is titled: Improvements to the sparse package of Scipy:
support for bool dtype and better interaction with NumPy
and can be found on my GitHub:
https://github.com/cowlicks/GSoC-proposal
