On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones
On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:58 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:58 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:58 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
I will look into making the NumPy trac read-only. It should not be too
complicated to extend Pauli's code to redirect the tickets part to
github issues.
If you need the map of trac IDs to github IDs, I have code to
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:58 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
I will look into making the NumPy trac read-only. It should not be too
complicated to extend Pauli's code to redirect the tickets part to
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I started the import with the oldest 75 and newest 125 Trac
I started the import with the oldest 75 and newest 125 Trac issues,
and will wait a few hours to do the rest to allow feedback, just in
case something is broken that I haven't noticed.
I did make one change to better emulate Trac behavior. Some Trac
usernames are also email addresses, which Trac
Kudos! Ray.
Very impressive and useful work.
-Travis
On Oct 19, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
I started the import with the oldest 75 and newest 125 Trac issues,
and will wait a few hours to do the rest to allow feedback, just in
case something is broken that I haven't
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
I started the import with the oldest 75 and newest 125 Trac issues,
and will wait a few hours to do the rest to allow feedback, just in
case something is broken that I haven't noticed.
I did make one change to better
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
I started the import with the oldest 75 and newest 125 Trac issues,
and will wait a few hours to do the rest to allow feedback, just in
case
Also, it looks like Trac issues 2228 and up weren't in the snapshot of
the DB I had. Those should be imported after Trac is disabled for new
bugs.
Ray
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Kudos! Ray.
Very impressive and useful work.
Indeed, many thanks, Ray!! This has been a ton of work, and somewhat
thankless b/c it's for a one-off thing. What I did for our lanunchpad
bug migration was a far more
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I plan to import all the Trac issues to github by the end of this
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
I plan to import all the Trac issues to github by the end of this
week. I want to get an up-to-date snapshot of the Trac DB, and run
another test import with it (just to make sure there's nothing in
recent bugs that
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
I plan to import all the Trac issues to github by the end of this
week. I want to get an up-to-date snapshot of the Trac DB, and run
another
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
I plan to import all the Trac issues to github by the end of this
week.
I plan to import all the Trac issues to github by the end of this
week. I want to get an up-to-date snapshot of the Trac DB, and run
another test import with it (just to make sure there's nothing in
recent bugs that isn't handled).
Previous test imports here:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks great! After a quick browse, the only thing I noticed that still needs
some thought is the color scheme for the labels.
That's easy to adjust afterwards.
___
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Thouis
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thouis, what needs to be done to make a testbed of the conversion ?
I just returned to this a couple of days ago [*], and last night
successfully imported all the trac issues (from my somewhat
out-of-date snapshot) to
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thouis, what needs to be done to make a testbed of the conversion ?
I just returned to this a couple of days ago [*], and last night
27.09.2012 15:46, David Cournapeau kirjoitti:
[clip]
Ok, so scipy.org was down again because of trac. Unfortunately, the
machine on which scipy.org lives is the same as trac, and is a bit
messy.
Trac runs on new.scipy.org, which AFAIK *is* a different machine from
scipy.org.
Pauli
27.09.2012 21:45, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti:
27.09.2012 15:46, David Cournapeau kirjoitti:
[clip]
Ok, so scipy.org was down again because of trac. Unfortunately, the
machine on which scipy.org lives is the same as trac, and is a bit
messy.
Trac runs on new.scipy.org, which AFAIK *is* a
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thouis, what needs to be done to make a testbed of the conversion ?
I just returned to this a couple of days ago [*], and last night
tl;dr I think I fixed everything mentioned below.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thouis, what needs
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com wrote:
tl;dr I think I fixed everything mentioned below.
By the way, my current method is to address bugs in the import by just
reimporting tickets that demonstrate the bug, and not worrying about
old versions of that ticket.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
tl;dr I think I fixed everything mentioned below.
By the way, my current method is to address bugs in the import by just
reimporting
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
I have turned on issue tracking and started a few labels.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Travis Oliphant
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Thouis (Ray)
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I have turned on issue tracking and started a few labels. Feel free to add
more / adjust the names as appropriate. I am trying to find someone who
can help manage the migration from Trac.
Are the github issues set
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
I have turned on issue tracking and started a few labels. Feel free to
add
more / adjust the names as appropriate. I am trying to find
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
The issue tracking discussion seems to have died. Since github issues
looks to be a viable alternative at this point, I propose to turn it on for
the numpy repository and start directing people in
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
The issue tracking discussion seems to have died. Since github issues
looks to be a viable alternative at this point,
There is an interesting project called http://huboard.com/The projects
suggests using a few Column Labels that provides a nice card-based window onto
the Github issues.
I have turned on issue tracking and started a few labels. Feel free to add
more / adjust the names as appropriate.
Hi All,
The issue tracking discussion seems to have died. Since github issues looks
to be a viable alternative at this point, I propose to turn it on for the
numpy repository and start directing people in that direction.
Thoughts?
Chuck
___
+1 on migrating issues to GitHub, I'm so glad this discussion is happening.
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
Uh oh. We are short on developers as is... Which brings up a question, do
people need a github account to open an issue?
Creating an
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Pauli
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Ralf Gommers
On May 5, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On May 5, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Wes McKinney wesmck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On
05.05.2012 22:53, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
would be great to get it done by end of June.To Charles' list
and Ralf's suggestions, I would add setting up a server that can
relay pull requests to the mailing list.
Don't know if you saw this, but it looks like Pauli is
On Saturday, May 5, 2012, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
05.05.2012 22:53, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
would be great to get it done by end of June.To Charles' list
and Ralf's suggestions, I would add setting up a server that can
relay pull requests to the mailing list.
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Saturday, May 5, 2012, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
05.05.2012 22:53, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
would be great to get it done by end of June.To Charles' list
and Ralf's suggestions, I would add setting up
On Saturday, May 5, 2012, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Benjamin Root
ben.r...@ou.edujavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'ben.r...@ou.edu');
wrote:
On Saturday, May 5, 2012, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
05.05.2012 22:53, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
would be great
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
The same is true of SciPy.I think if SciPy also migrates to use
Github issues, then together with IPython we can really be a voice that
helps Github. I will propose to NumFOCUS that the Foundation sponsor
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
The same is true of SciPy.I think if SciPy also migrates to use
Github issues, then together with IPython we can really be a
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/30/12 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the conversation left this list was with Ralf's
current list of preferences as:
1)
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/30/12 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the
01.05.2012 08:52, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
[clip]
3. No attachments for issues (screenshots, supporting documents, etc.).
Having API access to data won't help you here.
Using gists and references to gists can overcome this. Also using an
attachment service like http://uploading.com/ or
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 4/30/12 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Hi folks,
sorry for not jumping in before, swamped with deadlines...
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
I've been pretty impressed with the lemonade that the IPython folks have
made out of what I see as pretty limiting shortcomings of the github
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Travis
On 5/1/12 3:19 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
But if you do decide to go with GHI, it should be based on what the
system is like*today*, not on the hope that it will get better.
About a month ago they broke label filtering by turning multi-label
filters into an OR operation, which effectively
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
This example indicates that basing your decision on what it is like
*today* may not be valid either. You'd hope that they won't do
Very true ;)
Anyway, like everyone else has said, Ralf, Pauli, et. al. are really
Thanks Ralf,
I agree that Pauli and David have a lot of say in what we do. Thanks for
reminding.We will wait to hear from them. If together you three feel like
we should set up a separate Redmine instance than we can do that and just pay
special attention with the Github integration
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
The main problem with Github (besides the issues/PRs thing and no
attachments, which I can live with) is that to make it work we'll have
to religiously label everything. And because users aren't allowed to
attach labels, it will require a larger
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
to solve:
1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have)
Now that it comes too late: with some luck, I've possibly hit on what
was ailing the Tracs (max_diff_bytes
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
to solve:
1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have)
Now that it comes too late: with some luck,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
to solve:
1. responsive user interface
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I would agree that a good search facility is essential, and not keyword/tag
based.
Github issues does have full-text search, and up until now I haven't
really had too many problems with it. No sophisticated
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I would agree that a good search facility is essential, and not keyword/tag
based.
Github issues does have full-text search, and up
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe searching issues and pull requests is ok.
The problem is that in statsmodels we did a lot of commits without
pull requests, and I'm not very good searching in git either.
(I don't remember which change I looked for but I got
On 5/1/12 7:24 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
I would agree that a good search facility is essential, and not
keyword/tag based. I've found some trac tickets with google on occasion,
although not by initial intent.
I use google to search the sage trac these days, using a shortcut to
limit search
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
to solve:
1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have)
Now that it comes too late: with some
On Monday, April 30, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the conversation left this list was with
Ralf's current list of preferences as:
1) Redmine
2) Trac
3) Github
Since that time,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the conversation left this list was with
Ralf's current list of preferences as:
1) Redmine
2) Trac
3)
The same is true of SciPy.I think if SciPy also migrates to use Github
issues, then together with IPython we can really be a voice that helps
Github. I will propose to NumFOCUS that the Foundation sponsor migration of
the Trac to Github for NumPy and SciPy.If anyone would like
Jeroen's reply about the Sage buildbot is below:
Jeroen, do we have an
automatic buildbot system for Sage?
Depends on what you mean with automatic. We have the buildbot setup
at http://build.sagemath.org/sage/waterfall which builds automatically
but I still have to change versions by hand
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
I'm wondering about using one of these commercial issue tracking plans for
NumPy and would like thoughts and comments.Both of these plans allow
Open Source projects to have unlimited plans for free.
Free usage of
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I'm wondering about using one of these commercial issue tracking plans for
NumPy and would like thoughts and comments.Both of these plans allow Open
Source projects to have unlimited plans for free.
Free
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
I'm wondering about using one of these commercial issue tracking plans for
NumPy and would like thoughts and comments. Both of
On 2/13/12 2:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
I have the impression that the Cython / SAGE team are happy with their
Jenkins configuration.
I'm not aware of a Jenkins buildbot system for Sage, though I think
Cython uses such a system: https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/
We do have a
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:33 PM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/13/12 2:56 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
I have the impression that the Cython / SAGE team are happy with their
Jenkins configuration.
I'm not aware of a Jenkins buildbot system for Sage, though I think
Cython uses
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the impression that the Cython / SAGE team are happy with their
Jenkins configuration.
So are we in IPython, thanks to Thomas Kluyver's recent leadership on
this front it's now running quite smoothly:
I'm wondering about using one of these commercial issue tracking plans for
NumPy and would like thoughts and comments.Both of these plans allow Open
Source projects to have unlimited plans for free.
JIRA:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/overview/tour/code-integration
At work
I'm wondering about using one of these commercial issue tracking plans for
NumPy and would like thoughts and comments.Both of these plans allow Open
Source projects to have unlimited plans for free.
YouTrack from JetBrains:
http://www.jetbrains.com/youtrack/features/issue_tracking.html
82 matches
Mail list logo
