Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-17 Thread Didrik Pinte
Quick update: - the current static content for docs.scipy.org is about 2.7Gb. Some clean can happen but probably not going below 1Gb. - www.scipy.org is really small. -- Didrik On 16 March 2017 at 23:18, Robert T. McGibbon wrote: > I have always put my docs on Amazon S3

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-16 Thread Robert T. McGibbon
I have always put my docs on Amazon S3 (examples: http://mdtraj.org/1.8.0/ , .http://msmbuilder.org/3.7.0/) For static webpages, you can't beat the cost, and there's a lot of tooling in the wild for uploading pages to S3. It might be an option to consider. -Robert On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:08

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-16 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:15:08 +0100, Didrik Pinte kirjoitti: >> The advantage of something like github pages is that it's big enough >> that it *does* have dedicated ops support. > > Agreed. One issue is that we are working with a lot of legacy. Github > will more than likely be a great solution to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-16 Thread Didrik Pinte
On 15 March 2017 at 22:56, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Bryan Van de ven > wrote: > > NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally sponsored project, perhaps they can help > with the costs of different/better hosting. > > Enthought already

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:56:52 -0700, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: > [clip] >> As long as we can fit under the 1 gig size limit then GH pages seems >> like the best option so far... it's reliable, widely understood, and all >> of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:56:52 -0700, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: [clip] > As long as we can fit under the 1 gig size limit then GH pages seems > like the best option so far... it's reliable, widely understood, and all > of the limits besides the 1 gig size are soft limits where they say > they'll work

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Todd
On Mar 15, 2017 05:47, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 > hours: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Bryan Van de ven wrote: > NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally sponsored project, perhaps they can help with > the costs of different/better hosting. Enthought already provides hosting and operations support (thanks!) – the problem is that it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mar 15, 2017 12:28 PM, "Pauli Virtanen" wrote: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:11:09 -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk kirjoitti: > Astropy uses readthedocs quite happily (auto-updates on merges to master > too). AFAIK, scipy cannot be built on readthedocs. Another issue is that switching to rtd

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:11:09 -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk kirjoitti: > Astropy uses readthedocs quite happily (auto-updates on merges to master > too). AFAIK, scipy cannot be built on readthedocs. ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Astropy uses readthedocs quite happily (auto-updates on merges to master too). -- Marten ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Daπid
What about readthedocs? I haven't seen any explicit limit in traffic. On 15 March 2017 at 16:33, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 >> hours: >> >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Benjamin Root
How is it that scipy.org's bandwidth usage is that much greater than matplotlib.org's? We are quite image-heavy, but we haven't hit any bandwidth limits that I am aware of. Ben Root On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Bryan Van de ven wrote: > NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Bryan Van de ven
NumPy is a NumFocus fiscally sponsored project, perhaps they can help with the costs of different/better hosting. Bryan > On Mar 15, 2017, at 07:24, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2017 02:47, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Bryan Van de ven
Doesn't help all the CI builds that are failing because they utilize intersphinx to link to the official docs, unfortunately. Bryan > On Mar 15, 2017, at 05:59, Ilhan Polat wrote: > > By the way, this is not bad at all in the absence of the actual documentation >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mar 15, 2017 02:47, "Ralf Gommers" wrote: On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 > hours: > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Ilhan Polat
By the way, this is not bad at all in the absence of the actual documentation http://devdocs.io/numpy~1.12/ On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Ilhan Polat wrote: > In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so > that people can see that this is an

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Ilhan Polat
In the meantime maybe it's a good idea to keep one of the issues open so that people can see that this is an open issue? As we close them they disappear from the issues tab on Github On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-15 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 > hours: > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439 > > This has happened before: > >

[Numpy-discussion] Move scipy.org docs to Github?

2017-03-14 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, The scipy.org site is down at the moment, and has been for more than 36 hours: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/8779#issue-213781439 This has happened before: https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org/issues/187#issue-186426408 I think it was down for about 24 hours that time. >From the