On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:54 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:04 PM, David
On 07.02.2012 18:38, Sturla Molden wrote:
One potential problem I just discovered is dependency on a DLL called
libpthreadGC2.dll.
This is not correct!!! :-D
Two threading APIs can be used for OpenBLAS/GotoBLAS2, Win32 threads or
OpenMP.
driver/others/blas_server_omp.c
On 04.02.2012 16:55, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Although not ideal, I don't have a problem with that in principle.
However, wouldn't it break installing without admin rights if Python
is installed by the admin?
Not on Windows.
Sturla
___
On 27.10.2011 15:02, David Cournapeau wrote:
- we need to recompile atlas (but I can take care of it)
- the biggest: it is difficult to combine gfortran with visual
studio (more exactly you cannot link gfortran runtime to a visual
studio executable).
Why is that?
I have used gfortran
On 27.10.2011 15:02, David Cournapeau wrote:
- we need to recompile atlas (but I can take care of it)
May I suggest GotoBLAS2 instead of ATLAS?
Is is faster (comparable to MKL), easier to build, and now released
under BSD licence.
http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2
On 07.02.2012 14:38, Sturla Molden wrote:
May I suggest GotoBLAS2 instead of ATLAS?
Or OpenBLAS, which is GotoBLAS2 except it is still maintained.
https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
On 27.10.2011 15:02, David Cournapeau wrote:
- we need to recompile atlas (but I can take care of it)
- the biggest: it is difficult to combine gfortran with visual
studio (more exactly you cannot link gfortran
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
On 07.02.2012 14:38, Sturla Molden wrote:
May I suggest GotoBLAS2 instead of ATLAS?
Or OpenBLAS, which is GotoBLAS2 except it is still maintained.
I did not know GotoBLAS2 was open source (it wasn't last time I
checked).
On 07.02.2012 17:14, David Cournapeau wrote:
How did you link a library with mixed C and gfortran ?
Use gfortran instead of gcc when you link. gfortran knows what to do
(and don't put -lgfortran in there). Something like this I think:
gfortran -o whatever.pyd -shared cobj.o fobj.o -lmsvcr90
On 07.02.2012 17:15, David Cournapeau wrote:
I did not know GotoBLAS2 was open source (it wasn't last time I
checked). That's very useful information, I will look into it.
One potential problem I just discovered is dependency on a DLL called
libpthreadGC2.dll. First, it's a DLL that must be
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
On 04.02.2012 16:55, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Although not ideal, I don't have a problem with that in principle.
However, wouldn't it break installing without admin rights if Python
is installed by the admin?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:04 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:04 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:18 PM, David Cournapeau
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:18 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:18 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
compilers for official win32 installers. This
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
compilers for official win32 installers. This would of course concern
the next release cycle, not the ones where beta/rc are already in
progress.
Basically, the pros:
- we will have to move at some point
- gcc 4.* seem
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:02 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
compilers for official win32 installers. This would of course concern
the next release cycle, not the ones where beta/rc are already in
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Peter
numpy-discuss...@maubp.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:02 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
compilers for official win32 installers. This would of
On 10/27/2011 7:02 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
compilers for official win32 installers. This would of course concern
the next release cycle, not the ones where beta/rc are already in
progress.
Basically, the pros:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Jim Vickroy jim.vick...@noaa.gov wrote:
Hi David,
What is the msvcr90 vodoo you are referring to?
gcc 3.* versions don't have stubs to link against recent versions of
MS C runtime, so we have to build them by ourselves. 4.x series don't
have this issue,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:02 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
compilers for official win32 installers. This would of course concern
the next release cycle, not the ones where beta/rc are already in
Hi David,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:02 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
compilers for official win32 installers. This would of course concern
the next release cycle, not the ones where beta/rc are already
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:02 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we could finally move to a more recent version of
compilers for official win32 installers. This would of course concern
the next
25 matches
Mail list logo
