Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
Linda,
2008/10/13 Linda Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Those statements are not demeaning; lighten up.
STOP IT. JUST STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW.
Is there a moderator on the list to put a stop to these kinds of statements?
I deserve to be treated with respect.
I
Linda,
2008/10/13 Linda Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Those statements are not demeaning; lighten up.
STOP IT. JUST STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW.
Is there a moderator on the list to put a stop to these kinds of statements?
I deserve to be treated with respect.
I deserve to have my questions
Where is the moderator? Please get these condescending, demeaning personal
comments off of this list. I asked technical question. Now please send
technical information only.
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
I think you'll be hard pressed to find a more friendly, open and
relaxed mailing list than
On Oct 13, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Linda Seltzer wrote:
Is there a moderator on the list to put a stop to these kinds of
statements?
No.
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Numpy-discussion
Linda Seltzer wrote:
Where is the moderator? Please get these condescending, demeaning personal
comments off of this list. I asked technical question. Now please send
technical information only.
The problem is, you did not just ask
for technical information. You also
accused people of being
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Alan G Isaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, you did not just ask
for technical information. You also
accused people of being condescending
and demeaning. But nobody was
condescending or demeaning. As several
people **politely** explained to you,
Your reply is inappropriate. it is not a correction. A request was
made to stop posting mail that did not concern math and you have continued
with your put downs. Stop it. Just stop it. Stop it right now.
Linda Seltzer wrote:
Where is the moderator? Please get these condescending, demeaning
Alan, Stop tuyrning this around. Stop referring to my request as an
accusation and stop referring to your put-downs as a correction.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Alan G Isaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, you did not just ask
for technical information. You also
accused people
Ordinarily I avoid becoming involved in such acrimony, but I take this
single
opportunity to state clearly that I find Linda Seltzer's behavior utterly
rude
and childish.
Having been a member of this mailing list for over 6 years, I take
exception
to the pointless ranting and vitriolic comments
This ia another example of non-scientific attacking that does not belong
on the list. As I mentioned earlier: Please keep all non-mathematical or
non-computer science remarks off the list.
Ordinarily I avoid becoming involved in such acrimony, but I take this
single
opportunity to state
On Oct 13, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Linda Seltzer wrote:
Alan, Stop tuyrning this around. Stop referring to my request as an
accusation and stop referring to your put-downs as a correction.
Linda, from what I can tell, the tone in this discussion thread
changed from the professional, technical
I know, I know, last one...
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I had forgotten this wise quote from the smart questions FAQ:
Be gentle. Problem-related stress can make people seem rude or stupid
even when they're not.
Best,
Matthew
I received several pieces of advice concerning my previous question on the
use of 2-D arrays. However, none of these pieces of advice resulted in
code that works.
The latest suggestion
In numpy it's
import numpy as npy
a = npy.zeros((256,256))
produced this error message:
NameError:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Linda Seltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are the import statements I used:
import numpy as npy
from numpy.oldnumeric import *
Here is an example that works for any working numpy installation:
import numpy as npy
npy.zeros((256, 256)).
If those are the
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 03:11, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Linda Seltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are the import statements I used:
import numpy as npy
from numpy.oldnumeric import *
Here is an example that works for any working numpy
On 10/12/2008 2:39 AM Linda Seltzer apparently wrote:
Please, no demeaning statements like you forgot
a parenthesis or you were using someone else's code
- just the lines of code for a file that actually *works.*
Those statements are not demeaning; lighten up.
And the answer was correct.
Those statements are not demeaning; lighten up.
STOP IT. JUST STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW.
Is there a moderator on the list to put a stop to these kinds of statements?
I deserve to be treated with respect.
I deserve to have my questions treated with respect.
I deserve to receive technical
Friends,
Those statements are not demeaning; lighten up.
STOP IT. JUST STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW.
Let us not go to this place, honestly, there is no need. Let's go
back to the technical problem again.
Linda, did you have time to try Alan's example?
Best,
Matthew
L. Brooks of M.I.T. sent a professional e-mail with a code fragment that
has worked.
Friends,
Those statements are not demeaning; lighten up.
STOP IT. JUST STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW.
Let us not go to this place, honestly, there is no need. Let's go
back to the technical problem again.
Linda,
If you're familiar with Matlab syntax, you may find this link interesting:
http://www.scipy.org/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users
Here another couple of useful links
http://www.scipy.org/Tentative_NumPy_Tutorial
http://www.scipy.org/Numpy_Functions_by_Category
For your specific example, if you want
20 matches
Mail list logo