Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numexpr-3.0 proposal

2016-02-16 Thread Robert McLeod
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Robert McLeod > wrote: > >> >> 4.) I took a stab at converting from distutils to setuputils but this >> seems challenging with numpy as a dependency. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numexpr-3.0 proposal

2016-02-15 Thread Gregor Thalhammer
> Am 14.02.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Robert McLeod : > > Hello everyone, > > I've done some work on making a new version of Numexpr that would fix some of > the limitations of the original virtual machine with regards to data types > and operation/function count. Basically I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numexpr-3.0 proposal

2016-02-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Robert McLeod wrote: > > 4.) I took a stab at converting from distutils to setuputils but this > seems challenging with numpy as a dependency. I wonder if anyone has tried > monkey-patching so that setup.py build_ext uses distutils and then

[Numpy-discussion] Numexpr-3.0 proposal

2016-02-14 Thread Robert McLeod
Hello everyone, I've done some work on making a new version of Numexpr that would fix some of the limitations of the original virtual machine with regards to data types and operation/function count. Basically I re-wrote the Python and C sides to use 4-byte words, instead of null-terminated