Awesome, thanks Ralf!
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 1:13 AM Ralf Gommers wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>
>> These still are missing from the SciPy.org page, several months after the
>> release.
>>
>
> Thanks Stephan, that
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> These still are missing from the SciPy.org page, several months after the
> release.
>
Thanks Stephan, that needs fixing.
>
> What do we need to do to keep these updated?
>
These still are missing from the SciPy.org page, several months after the
release.
What do we need to do to keep these updated? Is there someone at Enthought
we should ping? Or do we really just need to transition to different
infrastructure?
___
On So, 2015-08-16 at 14:04 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
While waiting for Christoph to drop the other shoe on 1.10.0b1, I
thought I'd try again to start a discussion on the 1.11 release. If we
want to get the next release out in a timely manner there should be
some advance
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Sebastian Berg sebast...@sipsolutions.net
wrote:
On So, 2015-08-16 at 14:04 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
Hi All,
While waiting for Christoph to drop the other shoe on 1.10.0b1, I
thought I'd try again to start a discussion on the 1.11 release. If we
Hi All,
While waiting for Christoph to drop the other shoe on 1.10.0b1, I thought
I'd try again to start a discussion on the 1.11 release. If we want to get
the next release out in a timely manner there should be some advance
planning to cover at least the following three items
- Release