On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> Your points are well taken. However, my point is that this has been
>>> discussed on an open mailing list. Things weren't *as* open as they could
>>> have been, perhaps, in terms of board selection. But, there was
>>> opportun
Le 15/02/2012 04:07, Bruce Southey a écrit :
> The one thing that gets over looked here is that there is a huge
> diversity of users with very different skill levels. But very few
> people have an understanding of the core code. (In fact the other
> thread about type-casting suggests that it is ext
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
When we selected the name NumFOCUS just a few weeks ago, we created the
list
for numfocus and then I signed everyone up for that list who was on the
ot
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> I have to agree with Mathew here, to a point. There has been
discussions of these groups before, but I don't recall any announcement of
this group. Of course, now that it has been announced, maybe a link to it
should be prominent on the
On 2/14/12 7:17 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> * Fund Open Source Projects in Science (currently NumPy, SciPy,
> IPython, and Matplotlib are first-tier with a whole host of second-tier
> projects that could received funding)
> * through grants
So, for example, would the Foundat
>>
>> Your points are well taken. However, my point is that this has been
>> discussed on an open mailing list. Things weren't *as* open as they could
>> have been, perhaps, in terms of board selection. But, there was opportunity
>> for people to provide input.
>
> I am on the numpy, scip
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
When we selected the name NumFOCUS just a few weeks ago, we created the
list
for numfocus and then I signed everyone up for that list who was on the
>>
>
> I have to agree with Mathew here, to a point. There has been discussions of
> these groups before, but I don't recall any announcement of this group. Of
> course, now that it has been announced, maybe a link to it should be
> prominent on the numpy/scipy pages(maybe others?). It should a
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> When we selected the name NumFOCUS just a few weeks ago, we created the list
>>> for numfocus and then I signed everyone up for that list who was on the
>>> other one. I apologize if anyone felt left out. That is not my
>>
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Travis Oliphant
wrote:
>>
>> There is a mailing list for numfocus that you can sign up for if you
would
>> like to be part of those discussions. Let me know if you would like
more
>> information about
>>
>> When we selected the name NumFOCUS just a few weeks ago, we created the list
>> for numfocus and then I signed everyone up for that list who was on the
>> other one. I apologize if anyone felt left out. That is not my
>> intention.
>
> My point is that there are two ways go to about
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> There is a mailing list for numfocus that you can sign up for if you would
> like to be part of those discussions. Let me know if you would like more
> information about that. John Hunter, Fernando Perez, me, Perry
> Greenfield,
>>
>> There is a mailing list for numfocus that you can sign up for if you would
>> like to be part of those discussions. Let me know if you would like more
>> information about that.John Hunter, Fernando Perez, me, Perry
>> Greenfield, and Jarrod Millman are the initial board of the Foun
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:32 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> Hi Travis,
>>
>> It is great that some resources can be spent to have people paid to
>> work on NumPy. Thank you for making that happen.
>>
>> I am slightly confused about ro
14 matches
Mail list logo
