On 13 November 2013 02:40, Bart Baker wrote:
> > That is the order of the machine epsilon for double, that looks like
> roundoff
> > errors to me.
>
>
> I'm trying to my head around this. So does that mean that neither of
> them is "right", that it is just the result of doing the same
> calculati
> The issue is that there are some minor (10^-16) differences in the
> values when I do the calculation in C vs Python.
>
> That is the order of the machine epsilon for double, that looks like roundoff
> errors to me.
Hi Daπid,
Thanks for the reply. That does make sense.
I'm trying t
On 12 November 2013 12:01, Bart Baker wrote:
> The issue is that there are some minor (10^-16) differences in the
> values when I do the calculation in C vs Python.
>
That is the order of the machine epsilon for double, that looks like
roundoff errors to me.
I found similar results cythonising
Hi all,
First time posting.
I've been working on a class for solving a group of affine models and
decided to drop down to C for a portion of the code for improved
performance.
There are two questions that I've had come up from this.
1) I've written the section of code, which involved a series o
