Neal Becker wrote:
I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It
goes completely counter to the python philosophy.
I vote to ban them from numpy.
from numpy import array
x = array (xrange (10))
I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It goes
completely counter to the python philosophy.
I vote to ban them from numpy.
from numpy import array
x = array (xrange (10))
x[11]
Traceback (most
Neal Becker wrote:
I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It goes
completely counter to the python philosophy.
I vote to ban them from numpy.
from numpy import array
x = array (xrange (10))
Neal Becker wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It
goes completely counter to the python philosophy.
I vote to ban them from numpy.
from
Robert Kern wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It
goes completely counter to the python philosophy.
I vote to ban them from numpy.
from numpy import array
x =
On Jan 14, 2008 12:37 PM, Neal Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never liked that python silently ignores slices with out of range
indexes. I believe this is a source of bugs (it has been for me). It
goes
completely counter to the python philosophy.
I vote to ban them from numpy.