On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Anubhab Baksi anubha...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to deal with nearly 2**19 or 2**20 arrays of length about 250 each.
As mentioned elsewhere in this thread: what does deal mean. You may
be better off with something like:
http://kwant-project.org/tinyarray/
Hi,
I need to know about the relative speed (i.e., which one is faster) of the
followings:
1. list and numpy array, tuples and numpy array
2. list of tuples and numpy matrix (first one is rectangular)
3. random.randint() and numpy.random.random_integers()
Thank you.
On 08/29/2013 09:33 AM, Anubhab Baksi wrote:
Hi,
I need to know about the relative speed (i.e., which one is faster) of
the followings:
1. list and numpy array, tuples and numpy array
2. list of tuples and numpy matrix (first one is rectangular)
3. random.randint() and
African or European?
Why on earth would you ask that?
Its a Monty Python and the Holy Grail reference.
Eric
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Eric Moore e...@redtetrahedron.org wrote:
African or European?
Why on earth would you ask that?
Its a Monty Python and the Holy Grail reference.
Thanks. I had read that quite differently, and I'm sure I'm not the only
one. Some context would
On 8/29/2013 3:48 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Some context would have helped.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2R3FvS4xr4
fwiw,
Alan
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On 08/29/2013 01:48 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Thanks. I had read that quite differently, and I'm sure I'm not the only
one. Some context would have helped
My apologies--that was a rather obtuse reference.
In my oddly-wired brain it struck me as a fairly similar,
suboptimally-posed
And as you pointed out,
most of the time for non-trivial datasets the numpy operations will be
faster. (I'm daunted by the notion of trying to do linear algebra on
lists of tuples, assuming that's the relevant set of operations given
the comparison to the matrix class.)
Note the
On Aug 29, 2013 4:11 PM, Jonathan T. Niehof jnie...@lanl.gov wrote:
On 08/29/2013 01:48 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Thanks. I had read that quite differently, and I'm sure I'm not the only
one. Some context would have helped
My apologies--that was a rather obtuse reference.
Just for
Thanks all, my client actually wants the output at a minimum time.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.comwrote:
if you have a reasonably large amount of data (say O(100)),
I need to deal with nearly 2**19 or 2**20 arrays of length about 250 each.
On Thu, Aug
10 matches
Mail list logo
