On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:35 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Sebastian se...@sebix.at wrote:
On 2014-10-12 16:54, Warren Weckesser wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
mailto:robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Sebastian se...@sebix.at wrote:
On 2014-10-12 16:54, Warren Weckesser wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Regarding names: shuffle/permutation is a terrible naming convention
IMHO and shouldn't be propagated further. We already have a good
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Regarding names: shuffle/permutation is a terrible naming
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Warren Weckesser
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:35 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Thanks Warren, I think these are sensible additions.
I would argue to treat the None-False condition as an error. Indeed I agree
one might argue the correcr behavior is to 'shuffle' the singleton block of
data, which does nothing; but its more likely to come up as an unintended
error than as a
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com wrote:
I would argue to treat the None-False condition as an error. Indeed I agree
one might argue the correcr behavior is to 'shuffle' the singleton block of
data, which does nothing; but its more likely to come up
Hi Warren
On 2014-10-12 00:51:56, Warren Weckesser warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
A small wart in this API is the meaning of
shuffle(a, independent=False, axis=None)
It could be argued that the correct behavior is to leave the
array unchanged.
I like the suggested changes. Since
yeah, a shuffle function that does not shuffle indeed seems like a major
source of bugs to me.
Indeed one could argue that setting axis=None should suffice to give a
clear enough declaration of intent; though I wouldn't mind typing the extra
bit to ensure consistent semantics.
On Sun, Oct 12,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
A small wart in this API is the meaning of
shuffle(a, independent=False, axis=None)
It could be argued that the correct behavior is to leave the
array unchanged. (The current behavior can be interpreted
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
A small wart in this API is the meaning of
shuffle(a, independent=False, axis=None)
It could be argued that the correct
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
A small wart in this API is the meaning of
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:20 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:20 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Robert Kern
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
I created an issue on github for an enhancement
to numpy.random.shuffle:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5173
I'd like to get some feedback on the idea.
Currently, `shuffle` shuffles the first
On 2014-10-12 16:54, Warren Weckesser wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
mailto:robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com mailto:warren.weckes...@gmail.com
wrote:
A
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
I created an issue on github for an enhancement
to numpy.random.shuffle:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5173
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
I created an issue on github for an enhancement
to numpy.random.shuffle:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
I created an issue on github
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río
jaime.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to add some noise to a productive conversation: if you add a 'copy'
flag to shuffle, then all the functionality is in one place, and
'permutation' can either be deprecated, or trivially implemented in
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Sebastian se...@sebix.at wrote:
On 2014-10-12 16:54, Warren Weckesser wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
mailto:robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Warren Weckesser
I created an issue on github for an enhancement
to numpy.random.shuffle:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5173
I'd like to get some feedback on the idea.
Currently, `shuffle` shuffles the first dimension of an array
in-place. For example, shuffling a 2D array shuffles the rows:
In
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Warren Weckesser
warren.weckes...@gmail.com wrote:
I created an issue on github for an enhancement
to numpy.random.shuffle:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5173
I like this idea. I was a bit surprised there wasn't something like
this already.
A
26 matches
Mail list logo
