Alan, Stefan
Not raising errors seems ok for examples, but some of the unit tests are
also implemented as doctests and the failures are hidden in the logs. I'm
not sure what to do about this, but thought it worth pointing out. Also, it
would be nice if skipped tests didn't generate large bits of
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The skipped test verbosity is annoying; I'll see if there's a way to
make that a bit cleaner-looking for some low verbosity level.
The latest release version of nose from easy_install (0.10.3) doesn't
generate that verbose
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 21:47, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Alan McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The skipped test verbosity is annoying; I'll see if there's a way to
make that a bit cleaner-looking for some low verbosity level.
The latest release
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think aesthetics are worth requiring a particular version.
numpy doesn't need it; the users can decide whether they want it or
not. We should try to have it installed on the buildbots, though,
since we *are* the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:09:04PM -0400, Alan McIntyre wrote:
Actually I was considering asking to move the minimum nose version up
to 0.10.3 just because it's the current version before this aesthetic
issue came up. There's about 30 bug fixes between 0.10.0 and 0.10.3,
including one that
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Gael Varoquaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There might be a case to move to 10.3, considering the large amount of
bug fixes, but in general I think it is a bad idea to require leading
edge packages. The reason being that you would like people to be able to
rely
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:19:57PM -0400, Alan McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Gael Varoquaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There might be a case to move to 10.3, considering the large amount of
bug fixes, but in general I think it is a bad idea to require leading
edge
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Gael Varoquaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the rest I can't figure out how to get the information. I suspect we
can standardise on things around six month old. Debian unstable tracks
closely upstream, Ubuntu and Fedora have a release cycle of 6 months, I
