ould appreciate if someone could
> elaborate on or point me to the reasoning behind that decision.
>
> Thank you,
> Oleksandr
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NumPy-Discussion [mailto:numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org] On
> Behalf Of Julian Taylor
> Se

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Pavlyk, Oleksandr <
oleksandr.pav...@intel.com> wrote:
> Related to numpy.random_inter, I noticed that the randomstate package,
which extends numpy.random was
> not being made a part of numpy, but rather published on PyPI as a
stand-alone module. Does that mean

--Original Message-
From: NumPy-Discussion [mailto:numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org] On Behalf Of
Julian Taylor
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 8:10 AM
To: numpy-discussion@scipy.org
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Using library-specific headers
On 09/27/2016 11:09 PM, Pavlyk, Oleksandr wrote:
&

On 09/27/2016 11:09 PM, Pavlyk, Oleksandr wrote:
Suppose I would like to take advantage of some functions from MKL in
numpy C source code, which would require to use
#include “mkl.h”
Ideally this include line must not break the build of numpy when MKL is
not present, so my initial approach

Suppose I would like to take advantage of some functions from MKL in numpy C
source code, which would require to use
#include "mkl.h"
Ideally this include line must not break the build of numpy when MKL is not
present, so my initial approach was to use
#if defined(SCIPY_MKL_H)
#include