Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows build/distribute plan & MingwPy funding

2016-01-09 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Erik Bray > wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> You probably know

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows build/distribute plan & MingwPy funding

2016-01-04 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> You probably know that building Numpy, Scipy and the rest of the Scipy Stack >> on Windows is problematic. And that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Windows build/distribute plan & MingwPy funding

2016-01-04 Thread Erik Bray
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > You probably know that building Numpy, Scipy and the rest of the Scipy Stack > on Windows is problematic. And that there are plans to adopt the static > MinGW-w64 based toolchain that Carl Kleffner has done

[Numpy-discussion] Windows build/distribute plan & MingwPy funding

2016-01-02 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, You probably know that building Numpy, Scipy and the rest of the Scipy Stack on Windows is problematic. And that there are plans to adopt the static MinGW-w64 based toolchain that Carl Kleffner has done a lot of work on for the last two years to fix that situation. The good news is: this