Robert Kern wrote:
Chris Barker wrote:
What if your objects were nested sequences, and you wanted to partly
flatten them -- which would you flatten?
I'm pretty sure that that is exactly the ambiguity that the depth option
resolves. Can you give me an example where it's still ambiguous with
Christopher Barker wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Chris Barker wrote:
What if your objects were nested sequences, and you wanted to partly
flatten them -- which would you flatten?
I'm pretty sure that that is exactly the ambiguity that the depth option
resolves. Can you give me an example where
On Fri, January 4, 2008 8:00 pm, Pearu Peterson wrote:
On Fri, January 4, 2008 7:33 pm, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Pearu Peterson wrote:
Hi,
Say, one defines
class A(tuple):
def __repr__(self):
return 'A(%s)' % (tuple.__repr__(self))
and I'd like to create an array of A instances.
On Fri, January 4, 2008 8:00 pm, Pearu Peterson wrote:
On Fri, January 4, 2008 7:33 pm, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Pearu Peterson wrote:
Hi,
Say, one defines
class A(tuple):
def __repr__(self):
return 'A(%s)' % (tuple.__repr__(self))
and I'd like to create an array of A instances.
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 11:13 AM, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, January 4, 2008 7:33 pm, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
So, create an empty object array and insert the entries the way
you want
them:
a =
Just ignore this solution. It was not quite working
and I was able to get a segfault from it.
Pearu
On Fri, January 4, 2008 8:58 pm, Pearu Peterson wrote:
On Fri, January 4, 2008 8:00 pm, Pearu Peterson wrote:
On Fri, January 4, 2008 7:33 pm, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
Pearu Peterson wrote:
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
I like the depth option, and that could be used with the current
interface without too much difficulty, I think.
This question does come up quite often and should probably be addressed.
Yes, it has, but the depth option was discussed too, and while it might
solve
Chris Barker wrote:
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
I like the depth option, and that could be used with the current
interface without too much difficulty, I think.
This question does come up quite often and should probably be addressed.
Yes, it has, but the depth option was discussed too,
