There is not supposed to be a one-to-one correspondence between the
functions in numpy and the methods on an ndarray. There is some
duplication between the two, but that is not a reason to make more
duplication.
I would make a plea for consistency, to start with.
Those of us who write in an
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 19:35, Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 18:10, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/6/24 Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is not supposed to be a one-to-one correspondence between the
functions in numpy and the methods on an ndarray. There is some
duplication between the two, but that is not a reason to make more
duplication.
I would make a plea for consistency, to
Sebastian Haase wrote:
Are you saying the duplication is just random ? It would be better
-- as in: principle of minimum surprise -- if there would be some sort
reasonable set of duplicates
Yes it would be better. But how do you do it without breaking other
people code and avoiding
Hi Bob
2008/6/24 Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would make a plea for consistency, to start with.
Those of us who write in an OO style are required to switch backwards
and forwards between OO and not-OO, or to abandon OO altogether in our
NumPy code. Neither is an attractive option.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:33, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is not supposed to be a one-to-one correspondence between the
functions in numpy and the methods on an ndarray. There is some
duplication between the two, but that is not a reason to make more
duplication.
I would make
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:43, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 19:35, Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 18:10, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 02:43, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 19:35, Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
anything at http://www.scipy.org/FAQ . If I should have looked
somewhere else a URL would be gratefully received. ]
What's the reasoning behind functions like sum() and cumsum() being
provided both as module functions
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
anything at http://www.scipy.org/FAQ . If I should have looked
somewhere else a URL would be gratefully received. ]
What's the reasoning behind functions
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 18:10, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
anything at http://www.scipy.org/FAQ . If I should have looked
somewhere else a URL
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 18:10, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
anything at http://www.scipy.org/FAQ . If I should have looked
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 19:35, Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 18:10, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Bob Dowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I'm new here and this has the feel of an FAQ but I couldn't find
13 matches
Mail list logo
