Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 38 - Universal SIMD intrinsics

2020-02-12 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:19 AM Matti Picus wrote: > On 11/2/20 8:02 pm, Devulapalli, Raghuveer wrote: > > > > On top of that the performance implications aren’t clear. Software > > implementations of hardware instructions might perform worse and might > > not even produce the same result. > > >

[Numpy-discussion] NEP 44 - Restructuring the NumPy Documentation

2020-02-12 Thread Melissa Mendonça
Hi all, Please see the NEP below for a proposal to restructure the documentation of NumPy. The main goal here is to make the documentation more visible and organized, and also make contributions easier. Comments and feedback are welcome! See https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/15554 for details

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 38 - Universal SIMD intrinsics

2020-02-12 Thread Devulapalli, Raghuveer
>> I hope there will not be a demand to use many non-universal intrinsics in >> ufuncs, we will need to work this out on a case-by-case basis in each ufunc. >> Does that sound reasonable? Are there intrinsics you have already used that >> have no parallel on other platforms? I think that is rea