Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: [numfocus] Grants up to $3k available to NumFOCUS projects (sponsored & affiliated)

2017-03-31 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 31.03.2017 15:51, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Mar 31, 2017 1:15 AM, "Ralf Gommers" > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:42

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Fwd: SciPy2017 Sprints FinAid for sprint leaders/core devs

2017-03-31 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Sebastian Berg < > sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 22:46 +1300, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Agreed, and I would call that productive.

[Numpy-discussion] __array_ufunc__

2017-04-08 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, After a week of review and rework, the new and improved __array_ufunc__ has turned the corner and is headed down the homestretch. Now is the time for interested parties to give it a final lookover at https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/8247. Chuck

[Numpy-discussion] Long term plans for dropping Python 2.7

2017-04-14 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, It may be early to discuss dropping support for Python 2.7, but there is a disturbance in the force that suggests that it might be worth looking forward to the year 2020 when Python itself will drop support for 2.7. There is also a website, http://www.python3statement.org, where several

[Numpy-discussion] __array_ufunc__ final review

2017-04-21 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, The __array_ufunc__ PR is ready for final review. If there are no complaints, I plan to put it in tomorrow. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Relaxed stride checking fixup

2017-04-20 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Currently numpy master has a bogus stride that will caus

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Tensor Contraction (HPTT) and Tensor Transposition (TCL)

2017-08-15 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Paul wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently spent some time adding python interfaces to my tensor libraries: > * Tensor Contraction Library (TCL): https://github.com/springer13/tcl > * Tensor Transposition Library (HPTT):

Re: [Numpy-discussion] quantile() or percentile()

2017-08-13 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Eric Wieser wrote: > Let’s try and keep this on topic - most replies to this message has been > about #9211, which is an orthogonal issue. > > There are two main questions here: > >1. Would the community prefer to use

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pytest and degrees of separation.

2017-07-12 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Chris Barker > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Thomas Caswell >> wrote: >> >>> Going with option 2 is probably the

[Numpy-discussion] pytest and degrees of separation.

2017-07-11 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Just looking for opinions and feedback on the need to keep NumPy from having a hard nose/pytest dependency. The options as I see them are: 1. pytest is never imported until the tests are run -- current practice with nose 2. pytest is never imported unless the testfiles are

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

2017-06-29 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stef...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017, at 11:09, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I will be running the N

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

2017-06-29 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I will be running the NumPy sprint at Scipy 2017 and I'm trying to put > together a suitable list of things to sprint on. In my experience, > sprinting on NumPy is hard, e

[Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

2017-06-29 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I will be running the NumPy sprint at Scipy 2017 and I'm trying to put together a suitable list of things to sprint on. In my experience, sprinting on NumPy is hard, enhancements generally need lengthy review and even finding and doing simple bug fixes can take time. What I have in mind

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

2017-07-02 Thread Charles R Harris
latest/ > > Cheers! > Ben Root > > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: >> >>> Charles R Harris kirjoitti 2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

2017-07-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 10:49 -0400, Allan Haldane wrote: > > On 07/02/2017 10:03 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > Updated list below. > > > > > > On Sat, Jul

Re: [Numpy-discussion] New python/numpy user

2017-07-04 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:32 AM, wrote: > Hi Brian > > > First of all thanks for the answer, the explanations and the advices; as > mentioned I've to think differently in order to code with efficiency. > > 1.: yes 'mat[:,0]=vect0' works fine and I understand why :-) > > 2.

[Numpy-discussion] Making a 1.13.2 release

2017-07-06 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I've delayed the NumPy 1.13.2 release hoping for Python 3.6.2 to show up fixing #29943 so we can close #9272 , but the Python release has been delayed to July 11 (expected). The Python problem means that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making a 1.13.2 release

2017-07-06 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've delayed the NumPy 1.13.2 release hoping for Python 3.6

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Making a 1.13.2 release

2017-07-06 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 2017 NumPy sprint

2017-07-05 Thread Charles R Harris
Lots of good ideas here. It would help if issues were opened for them and flagged with the sprint label. I'll be doing some myself, but I'm not as intimately familiar with some of the topics as the proposers are. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.13.1 released

2017-07-06 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.13.1. This is a bugfix release for problems found in 1.13.0. The major changes are: - fixes for the new memory overlap detection, - fixes for the new temporary elision capability, - reversion of the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] proposal: smaller representation of string arrays

2017-04-25 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < > chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > > >> Presumably you're getting byte strings (with unknown encoding. > > > > No -- thus is for creating and using mostly

Re: [Numpy-discussion] proposal: smaller representation of string arrays

2017-04-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 26.04.2017 03:55, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Charles R Harris > > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] proposal: smaller representation of string arrays

2017-04-25 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Anne Archibald < > peridot.face...@gmail.com>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] proposal: smaller representation of string arrays

2017-04-25 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Tensor Contraction (HPTT) and Tensor Transposition (TCL)

2017-08-17 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Sebastian Berg < > sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > >> > How would the process look like if NumPY is distributed as a >> > precompiled binary? >> >> >> Well, numpy is BSD, and the

[Numpy-discussion] SciPy 2017 attendence

2017-05-21 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Just curious as to who may be attending SciPy 2017. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.13.0 release

2017-06-07 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I amn pleased to announce the NumPy 1.13.0 release. This release supports Python 2.7 and 3.4-3.6 and contains many new features. It is one of the most ambitious releases in the last several years. Some of the highlights and new functions are *Highlights*

Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.diff on boolean arrays now raises

2017-06-15 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Jaime Fernández del Río < > jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is an ongoing discussion on github: >> >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/9251 >> >> In 1.13 np.diff has

Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.diff on boolean arrays now raises

2017-06-15 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Jaime Ferná

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: SciPy 1.0 beta release

2017-09-17 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm excited to be able to announce the availability of the first beta > release of Scipy 1.0. This is a big release, and a version number that > has been 16 years in the making. It contains a few more

[Numpy-discussion] Sustainability

2017-10-03 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I and a number of others representing various open source projects under the NumFocus umbrella will be attending as meeting next Tuesday do discuss the problem of sustainability. In preparation for that meeting I would be interested in any ideas that the folks who follow this list may

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy default citation

2017-09-05 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi, everyone > > I see that the NumPy homepage does not have a "Citation" section. > Furthermore, on scipy.org, the default NumPy citation points to a short > summary paper that I wrote with Gael V & Stephen C.

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.13.3 released.

2017-09-29 Thread Charles R Harris
HI All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I am pleased to annouce the release of Numpy 1.13.3. This is a re-release of 1.13.2, which suffered from compatibility problems, see issue 9786 . It is a bugfix release for some problems found since 1.13.1. The most

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.13.2 released.

2017-09-27 Thread Charles R Harris
HI All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I am pleased to annouce the release of Numpy 1.13.2. This is a bugfix release for some problems found since 1.13.1. The most important fixes are for CVE-2017-12852 and temporary elision. Users of earlier versions of 1.13 should upgrade. The Python versions

Re: [Numpy-discussion] building numpy with python3.7

2017-12-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Hannes Breytenbach wrote: > OK, thanks for the link to the issue. I'm not using virtual environments > - I built python3.7 (and 2.7) with the `make altinstall` method. I managed > to get the numpy build working on 3.7 by removing the >

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14.0rc1 release

2017-12-13 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I am pleased to announce NumPy 1.14.0rc1. Numpy 1.14.0rc1 is the result of seven months of work and contains a large number of bug fixes and new features, along with several changes with potential compatibility issues. The major change that users will notice

[Numpy-discussion] Proposal of timeline for dropping Python 2.7 support

2017-11-05 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Thought I'd toss this out there. I'm tending towards better sooner than later in dropping Python 2.7 support as we are starting to run up against places where we would like to use Python 3 features. That is particularly true on Windows where the 2.7 compiler is really old and lacks C99

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal of timeline for dropping Python 2.7 support

2017-11-06 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:37 PM, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wro

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal of timeline for dropping Python 2.7 support

2017-11-09 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Matthias Bussonnier < bussonniermatth...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies if this mail appear out of thread I just subscribed to respond. > > > Yeah, agreed. I don't feel like this is incompatible with the spirit of > > python3statement.org, though

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14 branch.

2017-11-03 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I'd like to branch NumPy 1.14 soon. Before doing so, I'd like to make sure at a minimum that 1) Changes in array print formatting are done. 2) Proposed deprecations have been make. If there are other things that folks see as essential, now is the time to speak up. Chuckn

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14 branch

2017-12-07 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I plan to branch NumPy 1.14.x tomorrow, 08-12-1017. If anyone feels that there is a current PR that needs to be in, please comment. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP process update

2017-12-06 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would be great to have structure, and especially a template - ideally, > the latter is enough for someone to create a NEP, i.e., has lots of > in-template documentation. > > One thing I'd recommend thinking

[Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.14.x has been branch, master is open for 1.15 development.

2017-12-08 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Just a heads up that NumPy 1.14.x has been branched. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] SciPy 1.0 released!

2017-10-25 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > We are extremely pleased to announce the release of SciPy 1.0, 16 years > after > version 0.1 saw the light of day. It has been a long, productive journey > to > get here, and we anticipate many more

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sorting of an array row-by-row?

2017-10-20 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz < jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do not think that there is any particular relationship between the > order of the keys and lexicographic order. The key order is just a > convention, which is clearly documented. I agree that it is a bit

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy sprint May 24-25 at BIDS

2018-05-09 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi Matti, I need to know some details: 1. Where is the meeting 2. When is the meeting 3. Where are good places to stay 4. Is there a recommended airport I expect the university has a page somewhere with useful information for visitors, a link would be helpful. I've been to SV

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.15 branch

2018-05-11 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I'm thinking of branching 1.15 in the next week or so, not least because we need to get a fix out for the instruction reordering problem , maybe as a backport also. As it common with NumPy development, our attention gets dedicated to the top of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > I think Matthew Brett needs to fix this. > That would be nice, but I'm not convinced it is helpful :) I note that latest `apache-libcloud` does not install directly on windows, there seem to be some missing dependencies. Chuck

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Nathan Goldbaum > > wrote: > >> > >> I think Matthew Brett need

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Permissions to upload to PyPI

2018-06-12 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Matti Picus wrote: > Almost ready to finish the 1.14.5 release, but it seems I need permissions > to upload to PyPI (makes sense). My user name there is mattip. Can someone > help out? > Matti > Done. Sorry I missed that. Chuck

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.15.x branched.

2018-06-12 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, NumPy 1.15.x has been branched and master is now open for 1.16 development. If there are any remaining PRs that *just have to be in 1.15*, please complain here :0 Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org

[Numpy-discussion] SciPy 2018

2018-06-12 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Thought I'd raise the topic of meeting up at SciPy 2018. I wasn't planning on registering for the main conference, but would be happy to fly down for a couple of days if we plan on a meetup during sprints or some other point in the conference schedule. Chuck

[Numpy-discussion] Dropping Python 3.4 support for NumPy 1.16

2018-06-13 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I think NumPy 1.16 would be a good time to drop Python 3.4 support. We will want to do that anyway once we drop 2.7 so that we will only be using recent Windows compilers, and with Python 3.7 due at the end of the month I think supporting 3.5-7 for 1.16 should be sufficient. Thoughts?

[Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, There is a PR for the updated NumPy 1.15.0 release notes . I would appreciate it if all those involved in the thatn release would have a look and fix incorrect or missing notes. Cheers, Chuck ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > Are you planning on doing an rc release this time? I think the NumPy 1.14 > release was unusually bumpy and part of that was the lack of an rc. One > example: importing h5py caused a warning under numpy 1.14 and an h5py >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.14.5 bugfix release

2018-06-11 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Matti Picus wrote: > If there is a desire to do a bug-fix release 1.14.5 I would like to try my > hand at releasing it, using doc/RELEASE_WALKTHROUGH.rst.txt. There were a > few issues around compiling 1.14.4 on alpine and NetBSD. > Since 1.15 will probably be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Allowing broadcasting of code dimensions in generalized ufuncs

2018-05-31 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > p.p.s. Your multiple dispatch signature for broadcasted dimensions is > actually not quite right: should be > (n|1),(n|1)->() ===> > > (n),(n)->() | (n),(1)->() | (1),(n)->() | (n),() -> () | (),(n)->() >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP: Random Number Generator Policy

2018-06-03 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:03 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 9:24 PM Charles R Harris > wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Robert Kern >> wrote: >>> >>> This policy was first instated in Nov 2008 (in essence; the full set

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP: Random Number Generator Policy

2018-06-03 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > As promised distressingly many months ago, I have written up a NEP about > relaxing the stream-compatibility policy that we currently have. > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11229 > https://github.com/rkern/numpy/blob/nep/rng/doc/neps/ >

[Numpy-discussion] Python 3 compatible examples

2018-06-01 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, This post is prompted by this PR . It would be good to come up with a timeline and plan for rewriting the examples to be Python 3 compatible. When we do so, we should also make it assumed that `from __future__ import print_function` has been

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A roadmap for NumPy - longer term planning

2018-06-01 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Matti Picus wrote: > At the recent NumPy sprint at BIDS (thanks to those who made the trip) we > spent some time brainstorming about a roadmap for NumPy, in the spirit of > similar work that was done for Jupyter. The idea is that a document with > wide community

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14.4 released.

2018-06-06 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.14.4. This is a bugfix release for bugs reported following the 1.14.3 release. The most significant fixes are: * fixes for compiler instruction reordering that resulted in NaN's not being properly propagated

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Where to discuss NEPs (was: Re: new NEP: np.AbstractArray and np.asabstractarray)

2018-05-29 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote: > Reviving this discussion -- > I don't really care what our policy is, but can we make a decision one way > or the other about where we discuss NEPs? We've had a revival of NEP > writing recently, so this is very timely. > > Previously, I

[Numpy-discussion] Github down on comcast

2018-06-29 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Just a note for those who may be having a problem reaching Github, it is currently down for comcast users. See http://downdetector.com/status/github/map/. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-29 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Polynomial evaluation inconsistencies

2018-06-29 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Maxwell Aifer wrote: > Hi, > I noticed some frustrating inconsistencies in the various ways to evaluate > polynomials using numpy. Numpy has three ways of evaluating polynomials > (that I know of) and each of them has a different syntax: > >- > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-29 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Matti Picus > wrote: > > On 19/06/18 10:57, Matthew Brett wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Matti Picus >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 2:44 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Cha

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 574 - zero-copy pickling with out of band data

2018-07-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> Some of you might know that I've been working on a PEP in order to >> improve pickling performance of large

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PEP 574 - zero-copy pickling with out of band data

2018-07-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > Some of you might know that I've been working on a PEP in order to > improve pickling performance of large (or huge) data. The PEP, > numbered 574 and titled "Pickle protocol 5 with out-of-band data", > allows participating

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-30 Thread Charles R Harris
Not to worry, I'll just wait on the daily. On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 2:32 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Polynomial evaluation inconsistencies

2018-06-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Eric Wieser wrote: > > if a single program uses both np.polyval() and > np.polynomail.Polynomial, it seems bound to cause unnecessary confusion. > > Yes, I would recommend definitely not doing that! > > > I still think it would make more sense for np.polyval()

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Polynomial evaluation inconsistencies

2018-06-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Eric Wieser > wrote: > >> Since the one of the arguments for the decreasing order seems to just be >> textual representation - do we want to tweak the repr to something lik

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Polynomial evaluation inconsistencies

2018-06-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Eric Wieser wrote: > Since the one of the arguments for the decreasing order seems to just be > textual representation - do we want to tweak the repr to something like > > Polynomial(lambda x: 2*x**3 + 3*x**2 + x + 0) > > (And add a constructor that calls the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Polynomial evaluation inconsistencies

2018-06-30 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Ilhan Polat wrote: > I think restricting polynomials to time series is not a generic way and > quite specific. > I think more of complex analysis and it's use of series. > Apart from the series and certain filter design actual usage of > polynomials are always

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14.3 released

2018-04-28 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 1:51 PM Allan Haldane wrote: > Hi All, > > I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.14.3. This is a bugfix > release for a few bugs reported following the 1.14.2 release: > > * np.lib.recfunctions.fromrecords accepts a list-of-lists, until

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy grant update

2017-10-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to give everyone an update on what's going on with the NumPy > grant [1]. As you may have noticed, things have been moving a bit > slower than originally hoped -- unfortunately my health is improving

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Is there a better way to write a stacked matrix multiplication

2017-10-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > Hello, > > is there a better way to write the dot product between a stack of > matrices? In my case I need to compute > > y = A.T @ inv(B) @ A > > with A a 3x1 matrix and B a 3x3 matrix, N times, with N in the few >

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14.0 release

2018-01-06 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I am pleased to announce NumPy 1.14.0. Numpy 1.14.0 is the result of seven months of work and contains a large number of bug fixes and new features, along with several changes with potential compatibility issues. The major change that users will notice are the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Understanding np.min behaviour with nan

2018-01-11 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Andrew Nelson wrote: > > The same warning would have been issued from the same place in each of > the variations you tried. > > That's not the case, I tried with np.min([1, 2, 3, np.nan]) in a fresh > interpreter and no warning was raised. > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] building numpy with python3.7

2018-01-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Andras Deak wrote: > Hello, > > After failing with several attempts to build numpy on python 3.7.0a4, > the combo that worked with pip was > cython 0.28a0 (current master) > numpy 1.15.0.dev0 (current master) > in a fresh, clean venv. >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14.0 release

2018-01-14 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Eric Wieser > wrote: > > Did recarrays change? I didn’t see anything in the release notes. > > > > Not directly, but structured arrays did, for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Behavior of rint?

2018-01-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:41 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for my confusion, but I noticed (as a resul

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Behavior of rint?

2018-01-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for my confusion, but I noticed (as a result of the discussion > here [1]) that np.rint and the fallback C function [2] seem to round > to even. But - my impression was that C rint, by default, rounds

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Behavior of rint?

2018-01-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Behavior of rint?

2018-01-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Charles

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Behavior of rint?

2018-01-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:24 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Chuck, >> >> Thanks for the replies, they are very helpful. >> &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Behavior of rint?

2018-01-19 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > Thanks for the replies, they are very helpful. > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > O

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14.0 release

2018-01-14 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Eric Wieser >> <

[Numpy-discussion] Hoop jumping, and other sports

2018-02-07 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I was thinking about things to do to simplify the NumPy development process. One thing that came to mind was our use of prefixes on commits, BUG, TST, etc. Those prefixes were originally introduced by David Cournapeau when he was managing releases in order help him track commits that

[Numpy-discussion] @xoviat

2018-02-12 Thread Charles R Harris
Anyone know what happened to xoviat? He seems to have been disappeared. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.14.1 released

2018-02-20 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team, I am pleased to announce NumPy 1.14.1. This is a bugfix release for some problems reported following the 1.14.0 release. The major problems fixed are the following. - Problems with the new array printing, particularly the printing of complex values,

[Numpy-discussion] 1.15 release manager

2018-02-22 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, Would any of the other NumPy developers be interested in making the 1.15 release? It isn't difficult, and I don't mind doing it, but it would be a good thing if more people became familiar with the process. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing

Re: [Numpy-discussion] GSoC'18 participation

2017-12-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > It's the time of the year again where projects start preparing for GSoC. > So I wanted to bring it up here. Last year I wrote: "in practice working on > NumPy is just far too hard for most GSoC students.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another grant update, & numpy job ad is up!

2017-12-22 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Hi all, > > Two exciting bits of news: > > 1) We just posted the announcement of a second grant to BIDS for > NumPy, this time from the Sloan Foundation: > > https://bids.berkeley.edu/news/bids-receives-sloan- >

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.15.0rc1 released

2018-06-21 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, On behalf of the NumPy team I'm pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.15.0rc1. This release has an unusual number of cleanups, many deprecations of old functions, and improvements to many existing functions. A total of 423 pull reguests were merged for this release, please look at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct

2018-07-27 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > My ideal version would be substantially shorter, maybe just quote the > golden rule, but I am happy with the suggestion to just adapt this text. I > particularly appreciate the lack of absolutism in the

  1   2   3   >