and get a good
idea of their overall performance?
I explain a little bit more in the stackoverflow question...
Pierre Augier
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
of these functions with pure Numpy, Numba
and Pythran ?
You can find out the answer in our note http://tiny.cc/transonic-vision :-)
Pierre
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 21:16:06 +0100 (CET)
> From: PIERRE AUGIER
> To: numpy-discussion@python.org
> Subject: [Numpy-discussion] T
!
Pierre
--
Pierre Augier - CR CNRS http://www.legi.grenoble-inp.fr
LEGI (UMR 5519) Laboratoire des Ecoulements Geophysiques et Industriels
BP53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, Francetel:+33.4.56.52.86.16
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing
gt;
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:54 PM PIERRE AUGIER <
> pierre.aug...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>
>> Dear Python-Numpy community,
>>
>> Transonic is a pure Python package to easily accelerate modern
>> Python-Numpy code with different accelerators (c
Python functions with optimized compiled code). Of course, I hope I'm wrong!
IMHO, it does not remove the need for a successful HPy!
--
Pierre Augier - CR CNRS http://www.legi.grenoble-inp.fr
LEGI (UMR 5519) Laboratoire des Ecoulements Geophysiques et Industriels
BP53, 38041 G
t; On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:12 AM Ilhan Polat < [ mailto:ilhanpo...@gmail.com |
> ilhanpo...@gmail.com ] > wrote:
>
> Do we have to take it seriously to start with? Because, with absolutely no
> offense meant, I am having significant difficulty doing so.
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 20
I'd like to know if some people involved in the community are willing to be
co-authors of this potential reply.
Cheers,
Pierre
--
Pierre Augier - CR CNRS http://www.legi.grenoble-inp.fr
LEGI (UMR 5519) Laboratoire des Ecoulements Geophysiques et Industriels
BP53, 38041 Gren
Hi,
I'm looking for a difference between Numpy 0.19.5 and 0.20 which could explain
a performance regression (~15 %) with Pythran.
I observe this regression with the script
https://github.com/paugier/nbabel/blob/master/py/bench.py
Pythran reimplements Numpy so it is not about Numpy code for
uot;Sebastian Berg"
> À: "numpy-discussion"
> Envoyé: Vendredi 12 Mars 2021 22:50:24
> Objet: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Looking for a difference between Numpy 0.19.5
> and 0.20 explaining a perf regression with
> Pythran
> On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 21:36 +0
s do not give to the same performance). This
makes sense because it is indeed about the array creation.
I haven't yet studied in details this commit (which is quite big and not
simple) and I'm not sure I'm going to be able to understand it and in
particular understand why it leads to such performa
Hi,
When Numpy 1.20 was released, I discovered numpy.typing and its documentation
https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/typing.html
I know that it is very new but I'm a bit lost. A good API to describe Array
type would be useful not only for type checkers but also for Python
accelerators
11 matches
Mail list logo