On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Brett
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Chuck,
> >>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:24 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> Thanks for the replies, they are very helpful.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Charles R Harris
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> Thanks for the replies, they are very helpful.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Charles R
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> Thanks for the replies, they are very helpful.
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:41 AM, Charles R Harris
>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Mads Ipsen wrote:
>
> I am confused . Shouldn't rint round to nearest integer.
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/math/rint
It does. Matthew was asking specifically about its behavior when it is
rounding numbers ending in .5, not the
I am confused . Shouldn't rint round to nearest integer.
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/math/rint
Regards Mads
On Jan 19, 2018 15:50, "Matthew Brett" wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> Thanks for the replies, they are very helpful.
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:51 PM,
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for the replies, they are very helpful.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:41 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Matthew Brett
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:41 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for my confusion, but I noticed (as a result of the discussion
>> here [1]) that np.rint and the
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for my confusion, but I noticed (as a result of the discussion
> here [1]) that np.rint and the fallback C function [2] seem to round
> to even. But - my impression was that C rint, by default, rounds
10 matches
Mail list logo