Yes, that is the change I am thinking of. And yes, it hasn't happened yet.
But, it has been set to warn for a few years now, and there was a lot of
controversy over it when it was first proposed. That said, I do think the
way it was handled made sense, and it is a good model to follow for these
typ
On 07/18/2017 09:52 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> This sort of change seems very similar to the np.diag() change a few years
> ago. Are there lessons we could learn from then that we could apply to here?
>
> Why would the returned view not be a masked array?
>
> Ben Root
I am in favor of the propos
This sort of change seems very similar to the np.diag() change a few years
ago. Are there lessons we could learn from then that we could apply to here?
Why would the returned view not be a masked array?
Ben Root
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Eric Wieser
wrote:
> When using ndarray.squeeze,
