Joe Harrington writes:
> It's not an acronym, so that leaves the options of "Numpy" and
> "NumPy". It would be great, easy to remember, consistent for others,
> etc., if NumPy and SciPy were capitalized the same way and were
> pronounced the same (I still occasionally hear "numpee"). So, I
Thanks Joe, looks like everyone agrees:
In text, NumPy it is.
-CHB
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 2:41 PM Joe Harrington wrote:
> Here are my thoughts on textual capitalization (at first, I thought you
> wanted to raise money!):
>
> We all agree that in code, it is "numpy". If you don't use that,
got it, thanks.
I've fixed that typo in a PR I"m working on , too.
-CHB
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 2:41 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 1:42 PM Peter Andreas Entschev
> wrote:
>
>> My answer to that: "NumPy". Reference: logo at the top of
>>
Here are my thoughts on textual capitalization (at first, I thought you
wanted to raise money!):
We all agree that in code, it is "numpy". If you don't use that, it
throws an error. If, in text, we keep "numpy" with a forced lower-case
letter at the start, it is just one more oddball to
My answer to that: "NumPy". Reference: logo at the top of
https://numpy.org/neps/index.html .
In NEP-30 [1], I've used "NumPy" everywhere, except for references to
code, repos, etc., where "numpy" is used. I see there's one occurrence
of "Numpy", which was definitely a typo and I had not noticed
