On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:15 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:38 AM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:16 AM Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:45 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 4:34 PM, Stephan
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:38 AM Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:16 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:45 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 4:34 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>>>
>>> This is addressed in the NEP, see bullet 1 under
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:16 AM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:45 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 4:34 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>>
>> This is addressed in the NEP, see bullet 1 under "Partial implementation
>> of NumPy's API":
>>
>> http://www.numpy
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:46 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
> I'm also wondering where the list of functions that must be implemented
> can be found, so that libraries like dask and CuPy can be sure that they
> have a complete implementation, and further typeerrors won't be raised with
> their arra
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:45 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 4:34 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
>
> This is addressed in the NEP, see bullet 1 under "Partial implementation
> of NumPy's API":
>
> http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html#partial-implementati
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 4:34 PM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> This is addressed in the NEP, see bullet 1 under "Partial implementation of
> NumPy's API":
> http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html#partial-implementation-of-numpy-s-api
>
> My concern is that fallback coercion behav
>
> Your suggestion on the issue to switch from typeerror to warning is, imho,
>> much better, as long as the warning contains a link to an issue/webpage
>> explaining what needs to happen. It's only because I've been vaguely aware
>> of the `__array_function__` discussions that I was able to diagn
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:37 AM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, at 2:34 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> This issue is not very surprising - __array_function__ is going to have a
> fair bit of backwards compat impact for people who were relying on feeding
> all sorts of stuff into
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, at 2:34 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> This issue is not very surprising - __array_function__ is going to have a
> fair bit of backwards compat impact for people who were relying on feeding
> all sorts of stuff into numpy functions that previously got converted with
> asarray. A
