2010/3/30 David Cournapeau da...@silveregg.co.jp
Pauli Virtanen wrote:
[clip]
At least, I don't see what I would like to change there. The only thing
I wouldn't perhaps like to have in the long run are the PyString and
possibly PyInt redefinition macros.
I would also prefer a new name,
2010/3/30 David Cournapeau da...@silveregg.co.jp:
Currently, when building numpy with python 3, the 2to3 conversion
happens before calling any distutils command. Was there a reason for
doing it as it is done now ?
This allowed 2to3 to also port the various setup*.py files and
numpy.distutils,
David Warde-Farley wrote:
Hi,
In my setup.py, I have
from numpy.distutils.misc_util import Configuration
fflags= '-fdefault-real-8 -ffixed-form'
config = Configuration(
'foo',
parent_package=None,
top_path=None,
f2py_options='--f77flags=\'%s\' --f90flags=\'%s\'' %
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
David Warde-Farley wrote:
Hi,
In my setup.py, I have
from numpy.distutils.misc_util import Configuration
fflags= '-fdefault-real-8 -ffixed-form'
config = Configuration(
'foo',
parent_package=None,
top_path=None,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
2010/3/30 David Cournapeau da...@silveregg.co.jp:
Currently, when building numpy with python 3, the 2to3 conversion
happens before calling any distutils command. Was there a reason for
doing it as it is done now ?
This
ti, 2010-03-30 kello 07:18 -0600, Ryan May kirjoitti:
Out of curiosity, is there something wrong with the support for 2to3
that already exists within distutils? (Other than it just being
distutils)
http://bruynooghe.blogspot.com/2010/03/using-lib2to3-in-setuppy.html
That AFAIK converts only
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Hello Amenity,
Spring is upon us and arrangements for SciPy 2010 are in full swing.
We're already nearing on some important deadlines for conference
participants: April 11th is the deadline for submitting an abstract
for a paper,
This one bit me again, and I am trying to understand it better so I can
anticipate when it will happen.
What I want to do is get rid of singleton dimensions, and index into the
last dimension with an array.
In [1]: import numpy as np
In [2]: x=np.zeros((10,1,1,1,14,1024))
In [3]:
On 3/30/2010 10:13 AM, Tom K. wrote:
What I want to do is get rid of singleton dimensions, and index into the
last dimension with an array.
x=np.zeros((10,1,1,1,14,1024))
np.squeeze(x).shape
(10, 14, 1024)
hth,
Alan Isaac
___
NumPy-Discussion
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Tom K. t...@kraussfamily.org wrote:
This one bit me again, and I am trying to understand it better so I can
anticipate when it will happen.
What I want to do is get rid of singleton dimensions, and index into the
last dimension with an array.
In [1]:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:46, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Tom K. t...@kraussfamily.org wrote:
This one bit me again, and I am trying to understand it better so I can
anticipate when it will happen.
What I want to do is get rid of
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Tom K. t...@kraussfamily.org wrote:
This one bit me again, and I am trying to understand it better so I can
anticipate when it will happen.
What I want to do is get rid of singleton dimensions, and index into the
last dimension with an array.
In [1]:
Hello all,
I'm relatively new to numpy. I'm working with text images as 512x512 arrays.
I would like to set elements of the array whose value fall within a specified
range to zero (eg 23 x 45). Any advice is much appreciated.
Sean
___
On 3/30/2010 12:56 PM, Sean Mulcahy wrote:
512x512 arrays. I would like to set elements of the array whose value fall
within a specified range to zero (eg 23 x 45).
x[(23x)*(x45)]=0
hth,
Alann Isaac
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Alan G Isaac ais...@american.edu wrote:
On 3/30/2010 12:56 PM, Sean Mulcahy wrote:
512x512 arrays. I would like to set elements of the array whose value fall
within a specified range to zero (eg 23 x 45).
x[(23x)*(x45)]=0
Or a version that seems a bit
Hey Dag,
On 30-Mar-10, at 5:02 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Well, you can pass -fdefault-real-8 and then write .pyf headers where
real(8) is always given explicitly.
Actually I've gotten it to work this way, with real(8) in the wrappers.
BUT... for some reason it requires me to set the
On 30-Mar-10, at 2:14 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
Hey Dag,
On 30-Mar-10, at 5:02 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Well, you can pass -fdefault-real-8 and then write .pyf headers where
real(8) is always given explicitly.
Actually I've gotten it to work this way, with real(8) in the
Hi,
In an array I want to replace all NANs with some number say 100, I found a
method* **nan_to_num *but it only replaces with zero.
Any solution for this?
*
*Thanks
Vishal
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
On 30 March 2010 14:59, Vishal Rana ranavis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In an array I want to replace all NANs with some number say 100, I found a
method nan_to_num but it only replaces with zero.
Any solution for this?
ar[np.isnan(ar)] = my_num
where ar is your array and my_num is the number
In an array I want to replace all NANs with some number say 100, I
found a method nan_to_num but it only replaces with zero.
Any solution for this?
Indexing with a mask is one approach here:
a[numpy.isnan(a)] = 100
also cf. numpy.isfinite as well in case you want the same with infs.
Zach
That was quick!
Thanks Angus and Zachary
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Vishal Rana ranavis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In an array I want to replace all NANs with some number say 100, I found a
method* **nan_to_num *but it only replaces with zero.
Any solution for this?
*
*Thanks
Vishal
Andrea Gavana andrea.gavana at gmail.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On 29 March 2010 01:38, Kevin Dunn wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:24:01 +
From: Andrea Gavana andrea.gavana at gmail.com
Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Interpolation question
To: Discussion of Numerical
On 30-Mar-10, at 5:02 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Well, you can pass -fdefault-real-8 and then write .pyf headers where
real(8) is always given explicitly.
Okay, the answer (without setting the F77 environment variable) is
basically to expect real-8's in the .pyf file and compile the
2010/3/30 Andrea Gavana andrea.gav...@gmail.com:
On 29 March 2010 23:44, Friedrich Romstedt wrote:
When you have nice results using 40 Rbfs for each time instant, this
procedure means that the values for one time instant will not be
influenced by adjacent-year data. I.e., you would probably
Hi Friedrich All,
On 30 March 2010 21:48, Friedrich Romstedt wrote:
2010/3/30 Andrea Gavana andrea.gav...@gmail.com:
On 29 March 2010 23:44, Friedrich Romstedt wrote:
When you have nice results using 40 Rbfs for each time instant, this
procedure means that the values for one time instant
2010/3/30 Ryan May rma...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Alan G Isaac ais...@american.edu wrote:
On 3/30/2010 12:56 PM, Sean Mulcahy wrote:
512x512 arrays. I would like to set elements of the array whose value fall
within a specified range to zero (eg 23 x 45).
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:12:56 -0600,
Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Pascal pascal...@parois.net wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have an idea how fft functions are implemented? Is it
pure python? based on BLAS/LAPACK? or is it using fftw?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
friedrichromst...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/3/30 Ryan May rma...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Alan G Isaac ais...@american.edu wrote:
On 3/30/2010 12:56 PM, Sean Mulcahy wrote:
512x512 arrays. I would like to set elements of the
2010/3/30 Andrea Gavana andrea.gav...@gmail.com:
However, from the first 100 or so interpolated simulations, I could
gather these findings:
1) Interpolations on *cumulative* productions on oil and gas are
extremely good, with a maximum range of relative error of -3% / +2%:
most of them (95%
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 16:35, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
friedrichromst...@gmail.com wrote:
x *= ((x = 23) | (x = 45)) .
Interesting. In an ideal world, I'd love to see why exactly that is,
because I don't think multiplication
2010/3/30 Ryan May rma...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
friedrichromst...@gmail.com wrote:
We recently found out that it executes faster using:
x *= ((x = 23) | (x = 45)) .
Interesting. In an ideal world, I'd love to see why exactly that is,
because I
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 16:35, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
friedrichromst...@gmail.com wrote:
x *= ((x = 23) | (x = 45)) .
Interesting. In an ideal world, I'd
32 matches
Mail list logo
