Re: [Numpy-discussion] Changing FFT cache to a bounded LRU cache

Lion Krischer wrote: > I added a slightly more comprehensive benchmark to the PR. Please have a > look. It tests the total time for 100 FFTs with and without cache. It is > over 30 percent faster with cache which it totally worth it in my > opinion as repeated FFTs of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Changing FFT cache to a bounded LRU cache

Joseph Martinot-Lagarde wrote: > The problem with FFTW is that its license is more restrictive (GPL), and > because of this may not be suitable everywhere numpy.fft is. A lot of us use NumPy linked with MKL or Accelerate, both of which have some really nifty FFTs. And

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Changing FFT cache to a bounded LRU cache

> > A lot of us use NumPy linked with MKL or Accelerate, both of which have > some really nifty FFTs. And the license issue is hardly any worse than > linking with them for BLAS and LAPACK, which we do anyway. We could extend > numpy.fft to use MKL or Accelerate when they are available. > That

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Developer Meeting at EuroScipy?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Sebastian Berg wrote: > Hi all, > > since we had decided to do a regular developers meeting last year, how > would EuroScipy (Aug. 23.-27., Erlangen, Germany) look as a possible > place and time to have one? > I believe EuroScipy would

[Numpy-discussion] EuroSciPy 2016

Dear NumPy and SciPy communities, No annoucement was made here for EuroSciPy 2016 I believe. The call for contributions (talks, posters, sprints) is still open for a few days. EuroSciPy 2016 takes place in Erlangen, Germany, from the 23 to the 27 of August and consists of two days of tutorials

[Numpy-discussion] Developer Meeting at EuroScipy?

Hi all, since we had decided to do a regular developers meeting last year, how would EuroScipy (Aug. 23.-27., Erlangen, Germany) look as a possible place and time to have one? I believe EuroScipy would include a few people who were not able to come to SciPy last year, and it seems SciPy itself