[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Scipy 0.19.0 release candidate 2

Hi, I'm pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate for Scipy 0.19.0. It contains contributions from 121 people over the course of seven months. The main difference to the rc1 is several Windows specific issues that were fixed (special thanks to Christoph Gohlke).

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Could we simplify backporting?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Evgeni Burovski wrote: > > I really don't like the double work and the large amount of noise coming > > from backporting every other PR to NumPy very quickly. For SciPy the > policy > > is: > > - anyone can set the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Could we simplify backporting?

> I really don't like the double work and the large amount of noise coming > from backporting every other PR to NumPy very quickly. For SciPy the policy > is: > - anyone can set the "backport-candidate" label > - the release manager backports, usually a bunch in one go > - only important

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Could we simplify backporting?

On 24.02.2017 16:00, Evgeni Burovski wrote: >> I really don't like the double work and the large amount of noise coming >> from backporting every other PR to NumPy very quickly. For SciPy the policy >> is: >> - anyone can set the "backport-candidate" label >> - the release manager backports,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PowerPC testing servers

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> A recent post to the wheel-builders mailing list pointed out some >> links to places providing free PowerPC hosting for open source >> projects, if they agree to a submitted request: > > The debian project has some powerpc