On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
For shorthand, we can refer to the above choices with the nomenclature
shorthand ::= propagation destructivity payload_type
propagation ::= P | N
destructivity ::= d | n | s
payload_type ::= S | E | C
I really
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:33 PM, T J tjhn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:43 PM, T J tjhn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
An acid test for proposed
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
For np.gradient(), one can specify a sample distance for each axis to
apply to the gradient. But, all this does is just divides the gradient by
the sample distance. I could easily do that myself with the output from
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:09, Giovanni Plantageneto
g.plantagen...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have a simple question. I would like to have all the parameters of a
model written in a configuration file (text), and I
On Thursday, December 1, 2011, Thouis Jones thouis.jo...@curie.fr wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:47, Pierre Haessig pierre.haes...@crans.org
wrote:
Le 01/12/2011 14:52, Thouis (Ray) Jones a écrit :
Is this expected behavior?
np.array([-345,4,2,'ABC'])
array(['-34', '4', '2', 'ABC'],
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:52 AM, jonasr jonas.rueb...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
is there any possibility to define a numpy matrix, via a smaller given
matrix, i.e. in matlab
i can do this like
a=[1 2 ; 3 4 ]
A=[a a ; a a ]
so that i finally get
A=[ [1,2,1,2]
[3,4,3,4]
[1,2,1,2]
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
**
On 12/14/2011 01:03 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2011, McNicol, Adam amcni...@longroad.ac.uk wrote:
Hi There,
I am very new to numpy and have really only started investigating it as
one of my students needs some functionality from matplotlib. I have managed
to install everything under Windows for work in class but I
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011, questions anon questions.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
ok thanks, a quick try at using it resulted in:
IndexError: index out of bounds
but I may need to do abit more investigating to understand how it works.
thanks
The assumption is that these arrays are all the same
On Monday, January 9, 2012, questions anon questions.a...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the responses.
Unfortunately they are not matching shapes
print TSFC.shape, TIME.shape, LAT.shape, LON.shape
(721, 106, 193) (721,) (106,) (193,)
So I still receive index out of bounds error:
On Saturday, January 14, 2012, Thiago Franco de Moraes
totonixs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have the following problem:
Given a array with dimension Nx3, where N is generally greater than
1.000.000, for each item in this array I have to calculate its density,
Where its density is the
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
This sort of makes sense, but is it the 'correct' behavior?
In [20]: zeros(2, 'S')
Out[20]:
array(['', ''],
dtype='|S1')
It might be more consistent to return '0' instead, as in
In [3]: zeros(2,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
This sort of makes sense, but is it the 'correct' behavior?
In [20]: zeros(2, 'S')
Out[20]:
array(['', ''],
dtype='|S1
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:54 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Nathan Faggian
nathan.fagg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am finding it less than useful to have the negative index wrapping on
nd-arrays. Here is a short example:
import numpy as
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Nathan Faggian
nathan.fagg...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am finding it less than useful to have the negative index wrapping on
nd-arrays. Here is a short example:
import
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Nathan Faggian nathan.fagg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am finding it less than useful to have
On Thursday, January 19, 2012, Ruby Stevenson ruby...@gmail.com wrote:
hi, all
I am a newbie on numpy ... I am trying to figure out, given an array,
how to get back position value based on some conditions.
Say, array([1, 0, 0, 0 1], and I want to get a list of indices where
it is none-zero,
On Friday, January 27, 2012, Pierre Haessig pierre.haes...@crans.org
wrote:
Le 26/01/2012 19:19, josef.p...@gmail.com a écrit :
The discussion had this reversed, numpy matches the behavior of
MATLAB, while R (statistics) only returns the cross covariance part as
proposed.
I would also say
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bartosz Telenczuk
b.telenc...@biologie.hu-berlin.de wrote:
I have been using numpy for several years and I am very impressed with its
flexibility. However, there is one problem that has always bothered me.
Quite often I need to test consistently whether a
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Howard how...@renci.org wrote:
I have found, in using tricontourf, that in the mapping from data values
to color values, the range of the data seems to include even the data from
the masked triangles. This causes the data to be either monochromatic or
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/31/2012 8:26 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
I was just bitten by this unexpected behavior:
In [24]: all ([i 0 for i in xrange (10)])
Out[24]: False
In [25]: all (i 0 for i in xrange (10))
Out[25]: True
Turns out:
In
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 15:13, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Is np.all() using np.array() or np.asanyarray()? If the latter, I would
expect it to return a numpy array from a generator.
Why would you expect
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Olivier Delalleau sh...@keba.be wrote:
Le 31 janvier 2012 10:50, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 15:35, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote
2012/2/1 martin großhauser mgroszhau...@gmail.com
2012/2/1 martin großhauser mgroszhau...@gmail.com:
Hello,
when I try in my script to divide a masked array by a scalar I get an
error. The instruction is:
sppa = sp / 100.
sp is a masked array with ndim = 3.
error is:
On Wednesday, February 1, 2012, Pierre Haessig pierre.haes...@crans.org
wrote:
Hi,
[I'm not sure whether this discussion belongs to numpy-discussion or
scipy-dev]
In day to day time series analysis I regularly need to look at the data
autocorrelation (acorr or acf depending on the software
On Saturday, February 4, 2012, Naresh Pai n...@uark.edu wrote:
I am somewhat new to Python (been coding with Matlab mostly). I am trying
to
simplify (and expedite) a piece of code that is currently a bottleneck in
a larger
code.
I have a large array (7000 rows x 4500 columns) titled say, abc,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso jord...@octave.org
wrote:
Consider the following. Is this a bug?
Thanks,
- Jordi G. H.
---
#!/usr/bin/python
import numpy as np
x = np.reshape(np.random.uniform(size=2*3*4), [2,3,4])
On Thursday, February 9, 2012, Sturla Molden stu...@molden.no wrote:
Den 9. feb. 2012 kl. 22:44 skrev eat e.antero.ta...@gmail.com:
Maybe this issue is raised also earlier, but wouldn't it be more
consistent to let arange operate only with integers (like Python's range)
and let linspace
On Saturday, February 11, 2012, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
How to people feel about moving the issue tracking for NumPy to Github?
It looks like they have improved their issue tracking quite a bit and the
workflow and integration with commits looks quite good from what I can see.
On Monday, February 13, 2012, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like the ability to make in (i.e., __contains__) return
something other than a bool.
Also, the ability to make the x y z syntax would be useful. It's
been suggested that the ability to override the boolean operators
On Monday, February 13, 2012, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
I disagree with your assessment of the subscript operator, but I'm sure
we will have plenty of time to discuss that. I don't think it's
On Monday, February 13, 2012, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
I disagree with your assessment of the subscript operator, but I'm sure
we will have
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Here is the code I used to determine the coercion table of types. I
first used *all* of the numeric_ops, narrowed it down to those with 2
inputs and 1 output, and then determined the run-time coercion table.
Then, I
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
As you can see there were changes in each release. Most of these
were minor prior to the change from 1.5.1 to 1.6.1. I am still reviewing
the changes from 1.5.1 to 1.6.1.At first blush, it looks like there are
a lot
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
There is a mailing list for numfocus that you can sign up for if you
would
like to be part of those discussions. Let me know if you
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I have to agree with Mathew here, to a point. There has been
discussions of these groups before, but I don't recall any announcement of
this group. Of course, now that it has been announced, maybe a link to it
should be
Just a thought I had. Right now, I can pass a list of python ints or
floats into np.array() and get a numpy array with a sensible dtype. Is
there any reason why we can't do the same for python's datetime? Right
now, it is very easy for me to make a list comprehension of datetime
objects using
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Just a thought I had. Right now, I can pass a list of python ints or
floats into np.array() and get a numpy array with a sensible dtype. Is
there any reason
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, David Gowers (kampu) 00a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
This email is about the difference, given a recarray 'arr',
between
A)
arr.foo.x[0]
and B)
arr.foo[0].x
Specifically, form A returns the 0-th x value, whereas form B raises
AttributeError:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, David Gowers (kampu) 00a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
This email is about the difference, given a recarray 'arr',
between
A)
arr.foo.x[0]
and B)
arr.foo[0].x
Specifically
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Just a thought I
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/15/2012 2:46 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
The NA discussion is the perfect example where a governance structure
would help resolve disputes.
How? I'm not seeing it.
Who would have behaved differently and why
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:08 PM, T J tjhn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.comwrote:
for the core developers. The right way to produce a
governance structure is to make concrete proposals and
show how these proposals are in the interest of
...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu
mailto:ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Alan G Isaac
alan.is...@gmail.com mailto:alan.is...@gmail.com
wrote
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no wrote:
On 02/15/2012 02:24 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
There certainly is governance now, it's just informal. It's a
combination of
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Travis Vaught tra...@vaught.net wrote:
On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Travis's proposal is that we go from a large number of self-selecting
people putting in
On Thursday, February 16, 2012, Warren Weckesser wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Mark Wiebe and I have been discussing off and on (as well as talking with
Charles) a good way forward to balance two competing desires:
* addition of
On Thursday, February 16, 2012, John Hunter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Alan G Isaac
alan.is...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'alan.is...@gmail.com');
wrote:
On 2/16/2012 7:22 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
This has not been an encouraging episode in striving for consensus.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Christopher Jordan-Squire
cjord...@uw.eduwrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu
wrote:
On 02/17/2012 05:39 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Fri,
On Saturday, February 18, 2012, Sturla Molden wrote:
Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 17:12 skrev Alan G Isaac
alan.is...@gmail.comjavascript:;
:
How does stream-lined code written for maintainability
(i.e., with helpful comments and tests) become *less*
accessible to amateurs??
I think
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 21:09, Gael Varoquaux
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:07:04PM -0500, Wes McKinney wrote:
In this last case for example, around 500 MB of RAM is taken up for an
On Saturday, February 25, 2012, Alan G Isaac wrote:
On 2/25/2012 4:44 PM, James Bergstra wrote:
bincount([]) makes no sense,
I disagree:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/42041
but if a minlength argument is provided,
then the routine should succeed.
On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 13:59, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Keith Goodman kwgood...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:36 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
How about numpy.ptp, to follow this line? I would expect it's single
pass, but wouldn't short circuit compared to cython of Keith
I[1] a = np.ones(10)
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Pierre Haessig pierre.haes...@crans.org
Coming back to Travis proposition bit-pattern approaches to
On Wednesday, March 7, 2012, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering what is the use for the ignored data feature?
I can use:
A[valid_A_indexes] = whatever
to process only the
On Wednesday, March 7, 2012, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering what is the use for the ignored data feature?
I can use:
A[valid_A_indexes] = whatever
to process only the 'non-ignored' portions of A.
On Thursday, March 15, 2012, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Bryan Van de Ven bry...@continuum.io
wrote:
Hi all,
I have started working on a NEP for adding an enumerated type to NumPy.
On Thursday, March 15, 2012, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that float96 on windows 32
On Sunday, March 18, 2012, ava...@famaf.unc.edu.ar wrote:
Dear list,
I am having problems installing matplotlib (from source) and fipy.
I had installed numpy from source and it is running well:
:~$ python -c import numpy; print numpy.__version__
1.6.1
After being trying to solve this
On Friday, April 6, 2012, Val Kalatsky wrote:
The only slicing short-cut I can think of is the Ellipsis object, but it's
not going to help you much here.
The alternatives that come to my mind are (1) manipulation of shape
directly and (2) building a string and running eval on it.
Your
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jonathan T. Niehof jnie...@lanl.govwrote:
On 04/06/2012 06:54 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
Take a peek at how np.gradient() does it. It creates a list of None with
a length equal to the number of dimensions, and then inserts a slice
object in the appropriate
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Francesc Alted franc...@continuum.iowrote:
On 4/10/12 9:55 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
On 10/04/2012 16:36, Francesc Alted wrote:
In [10]: timeit c = numpy.complex64(numpy.abs(numpy.complex128(b)))
100 loops, best of 3: 12.3 ms per loop
In [11]: timeit
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan T. Niehof jnie...@lanl.govwrote:
On 04/09/2012 09:11 PM, Tony Yu wrote:
I guess I wasn't reading very carefully and assumed that you meant a
list of `slice(None)` instead of a list of `None`.
My apologies to Ben...I wasn't being pedantic to be a
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:38 PM, santhu kumar mesan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to optimise a code and want your suggestions.
A : - NX3 matrix (coordinates of N points)
After performing pairwise distance computations(called pdist) between
these points, depending upon a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Pierre Haessig
pierre.haes...@crans.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 24/04/2012 15:14, Charles R Harris a écrit :
a)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.zawrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and so
Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
2012/4/24 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za javascript:;
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
tra...@continuum.iojavascript:;
wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
pretty boring.
The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Richard Hattersley
rhatters...@gmail.comwrote:
I know used a somewhat jokey tone in my original posting, but
fundamentally it was a serious question concerning a live topic. So I'm
curious about the lack of response. Has this all been covered before?
Sorry if
On Monday, April 30, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Hey all,
We have been doing some investigation of various approaches to issue
tracking. The last time the conversation left this list was with
Ralf's current list of preferences as:
1) Redmine
2) Trac
3) Github
Since that time,
On Wednesday, May 2, 2012, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Kevin Jacobs
jac...@bioinformed.comjavascript:;
bioinfor...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
A FLANN implementation should be even faster--perhaps by as much as
another
factor of two.
I guess it
On Saturday, May 5, 2012, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
05.05.2012 22:53, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
would be great to get it done by end of June.To Charles' list
and Ralf's suggestions, I would add setting up a server that can
relay pull requests to the mailing list.
On Saturday, May 5, 2012, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Benjamin Root
ben.r...@ou.edujavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'ben.r...@ou.edu');
wrote:
On Saturday, May 5, 2012, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
05.05.2012 22:53, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
[clip]
would be great
Just noticed this in the output from printing some numpy record arrays:
[[('2008081712', -24, -78.0, 20.10381469727, 45.0, -999.0, 0.0)]
[ ('2008081718', -18, -79.584741211, 20.70762939453, 45.0, -999.0,
0.0)]
[ ('2008081800', -12, -80.3305175781, 21.10381469727, 45.0,
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of
NumPy 1.6.2. This is a maintenance release. Due to the delay of the NumPy
1.7.0, this release contains far more fixes than a regular
Hello all,
I need to sort a structured array in a stable manner. I am also sorting
only by one of the keys, so I don't think lexsort() is stable in that
respect. np.sort() allows for choosing 'mergesort', but it appears to not
be implemented for structured arrays. Am I going to have to create
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
Hello all,
I need to sort a structured array in a stable manner. I am also sorting
only by one of the keys, so I don't think lexsort
On Saturday, May 12, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Another approach would be to introduce a method:
a.diag(copy=False)
and leave a.diagonal() alone. Then, a.diagonal() could be deprecated over
2-3 releases.
-Travis
+1
Ben Root
___
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Frédéric Bastien no...@nouiz.org wrote:
Hi,
In fact, I would arg to never change the current behavior, but add the
flag for people that want to use it.
Why?
1) There is
On Friday, May 18, 2012, Chao YUE wrote:
Dear all,
This is only a small python import question. I think I'm right but just
want some confirmation.
Previously I have installed numpy 1.5.1. and then I used pip install
--upgrade numpy
to install numpy 1.6.1
But when I try to import numpy
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Jonathan T. Niehof jnie...@lanl.govwrote:
On 05/23/2012 05:31 PM, T J wrote:
It seems that there are a number of ways to check if an array is a view.
Do we have a preferred way in the API that is guaranteed to stay
available? Or are all of the various
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.ukwrote:
Hi All,
I have an array:
arrrgh = numpy.zeros(1)
A sparse collection of elements will have values greater than zero:
arrrgh[] = 2
arrrgh[3453453] =42
The *wrong* way to do this is:
for i in
On Sunday, May 27, 2012, Chao YUE wrote:
for me, np.nonzero() and np.where() both work. It seems they have same
function.
chao
They are not identical. Nonzeros is for indices. The where function is
really meant for a different purpose, but special-cases for this call
signature.
Ben Root
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
Hi All,
Any reason why this:
import numpy
numpy.zeros(10)[-123]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in
On Sunday, June 3, 2012, Ralf Gommers wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Nathaniel Smith
n...@pobox.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'n...@pobox.com');
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Ralf Gommers
ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
On Monday, June 4, 2012, Chris Barker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Patrick Redmond
plredm...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Here's how I sorted primarily by field 'a' descending and secondarily by
field 'b' ascending:
could you multiply the numeric field by -1, sort, then put
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Monday, June 4, 2012, Chris Barker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Patrick Redmond plredm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here's how I sorted
Not sure if this is a bug or not. I am using a fairly recent master branch.
# Setting up...
import numpy as np
a = np.zeros((10, 1), dtype=[('foo', 'f4'), ('bar', 'f4'), ('spam',
'f4')])
a['foo'] = np.random.random((10, 1))
a['bar'] = np.random.random((10, 1))
a['spam'] =
On Thursday, June 21, 2012, Robert Kern wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, eat e.antero.ta...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
Heh,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Robert Kern
robert.k...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, bob tnur
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:42 AM, eat e.antero.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Gael Varoquaux
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:59:09PM -0400, Benjamin Root wrote:
munkres seems to be a pure python implementation
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
Accessing individual elements of NumPy arrays is slower than accessing
individual elements of lists --- around 2.5x-3x slower.NumPy has to do
more work to figure out what kind of indexing you are trying to do
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.iowrote:
C was famous for bugs due to the lack of function prototypes. This was
fixed with C99 and the stricter typing was a great help.
Bugs are not due to lack of function prototypes. Bugs are due to
mistakes that
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:48 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Let us note that that problem was due to Travis convincing David to
include the Datetime work in the release against David's own best
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Charles R Harris
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com javascript:; wrote:
On 6/26/12 3:06 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Something the Sage project does very well is meeting often in person
Another thing we have
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andrew Dalke da...@dalkescientific.com
wrote:
In this email I propose a few changes which I think are minor
and which don't really affect the external NumPy API but which
I think could
1 - 100 of 585 matches
Mail list logo