Hi Chuck
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll bet the skimage problems come from
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3811. They may be doing something
naughty...
Reverting that commit fixes those skimage failures. However, there are a
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.zawrote:
Hi Chuck
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll bet the skimage problems come from
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3811. They may be doing something
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.zawrote:
Hi Chuck
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll bet the skimage
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.zawrote:
Hi Chuck
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:07 AM,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
2) Bottleneck 0.7.0
https://github.com/kwgoodman/bottleneck/issues/71#issuecomment-25331701
I can't tell if these are real bugs in numpy, or tests checking that
bottleneck is bug-for-bug compatible with old numpy and we
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
wrote:
2) Bottleneck 0.7.0
https://github.com/kwgoodman/bottleneck/issues/71#issuecomment-25331701
I can't tell if these are real bugs in numpy, or
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
wrote:
2) Bottleneck 0.7.0
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
01.10.2013 16:28, Jack Howarth kirjoitti:
[clip]
/sw/bin/python2.7 setup.py build
which fails at...
/sw/bin/gfortran -Wall -L/sw/lib
build/temp.macosx-10.6-x86_64-2.7/numpy/linalg/lapack_litemodule.o
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:52:06PM +0100, Robert Kern wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
01.10.2013 16:28, Jack Howarth kirjoitti:
[clip]
/sw/bin/python2.7
Everyone please do actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I think people don't always realize this.
Here's how it works:
- If you test it *now*, and it breaks your code that worked with 1.7,
and you *tell* us this now, then it's *our* problem and we hold up the
release to fix
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone please do
actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I think people don't always realize this.
Here's how it works:
- If you test it *now*, and it breaks your code that worked with 1.7,
and you *tell* us this now, then
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone please do
actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I think people don't always realize this.
Here's how it works:
- If you test it *now*,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone please do
actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone please do
actually test this! It is really in your best
interest, and I think
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 11:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Everyone
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 3:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu
mailto:cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 3:45
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christoph Gohlke cgoh...@uci.edu wrote:
On 9/30/2013 4:44 PM, Julian Taylor wrote:
On 01.10.2013 01:30, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM,
20 matches
Mail list logo
