Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building a static libnumpy

2008-02-14 Thread Jussi Enkovaara
Jussi Enkovaara wrote: It is of course very cumbersome as one has to specify all the modules which are written in C before compiling the actual interpreter. I think that the whole procedure cannot be automatized, but it should be possible to have distutils to create the static library

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building a static libnumpy

2008-01-22 Thread Stefan van der Walt
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:12:32PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 3:44 PM, Jussi Enkovaara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I need to use numpy in an environment which does not support shared libraries. Previously, I have used the old Numeric where I created a Makefile to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building a static libnumpy

2008-01-22 Thread Jussi Enkovaara
David Cournapeau wrote: On Jan 22, 2008 3:44 PM, Jussi Enkovaara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I need to use numpy in an environment which does not support shared libraries. Previously, I have used the old Numeric where I created a Makefile to build a static Numeric library which was later

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building a static libnumpy

2008-01-21 Thread Matthieu Brucher
Hi, I think the main problem would be that some parts of Numpy are coded in C and that they must be compiled as a shared library so that Python can access them. Matthieu 2008/1/22, Jussi Enkovaara [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I need to use numpy in an environment which does not support shared

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building a static libnumpy

2008-01-21 Thread Robert Kern
Jussi Enkovaara wrote: Hi, I need to use numpy in an environment which does not support shared libraries. Previously, I have used the old Numeric where I created a Makefile to build a static Numeric library which was later on linked to the python interpreter. As far as I understood, numpy