On 03/27/2010 01:31 PM, Ryan May wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM,josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ryan Mayrma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan Mayrma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2010 01:31 PM, Ryan May wrote:
Because of the call to asarray(), the mask is completely discarded and
you end up with identical results to an unmasked array,
which is not what I'd expect. Worse, the actual
Hi,
I decided that having actual code that does what I want and keeps
backwards compatibility (and adds tests) might be better than arguing
semantics. I've updated my patch to:
* Uses the array.sum() method instead of add.reduce to make subclasses
fully work (this was still breaking masked
On 03/29/2010 10:17 AM, Ryan May wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Bruce Southeybsout...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2010 01:31 PM, Ryan May wrote:
Because of the call to asarray(), the mask is completely discarded and
you end up with identical results to an unmasked array,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
subclasses of ndarray, like masked_arrays and quantities, and classes
that delegate to array calculations, like pandas, can redefine
anything. So there is not much that can be relied on if any subclass
is allowed to be used inside
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found that trapz() doesn't work with subclasses:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found that trapz()
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matrices have been part of numpy for a long time and your patch would
break backwards compatibility in a pretty serious way.
Yeah, and I should admit that I realize that makes this particular
patch a no-go. However, that to me
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:23 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matrices have been part of numpy for a long time and your patch would
break backwards compatibility in a pretty serious way.
Yeah, and I should admit that I realize
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found that trapz() doesn't work with subclasses:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1438
A simple patch (attached) to change asarray() to asanyarray()
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ryan May rma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found that trapz() doesn't work with subclasses:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1438
A simple patch (attached) to change asarray() to asanyarray() fixes
the problem fine.
Are you sure this function works with
13 matches
Mail list logo
