On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Charles Lepple wrote:
I think the networking layer would be easier than multiple USB connections on
an UPS (assuming integrated USB/power cables). Manufacturers seem to have a
hard time supporting both USB and serial at once, let alone multiple USB
device-side connections.
On Sep 1, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
If you have a full network link, you wouldn't need a USB hookup.
Perhaps
that is what you meant by "NUT protocol"? You meant the protocol
between
the nut driver and the UPS.
I was originally referring to the TCP protocol between the NU
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Charles Lepple wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Stuart D Gathman wrote:
The problem:
We maintain small servers in customer offices. Customers often get
confused when asked to plug the server into the UPS. Sometimes they
have multiple servers from different vendors
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Stuart D Gathman wrote:
> The problem:
>
> We maintain small servers in customer offices. Customers often get
> confused when asked to plug the server into the UPS. Sometimes they
> have multiple servers from different vendors, and multiple UPSs, and
> plug our s
The problem:
We maintain small servers in customer offices. Customers often get
confused when asked to plug the server into the UPS. Sometimes they
have multiple servers from different vendors, and multiple UPSs, and
plug our server into the wrong UPS. The end result is that the UPS
being monit
