Re: [Nut-upsuser] Spurious messages on start

2006-11-11 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
Pedro Côrte-Real wrote: > When I start or restart nut I get three spurious messages as > everything starts up: > > UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] is unavailable > Communications with UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] lost > Communications with UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] established I see the same stuff when I use my USB p

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Sweex 1000VA UPS

2006-11-11 Thread Sergiy Kazakov
To prevent system shutdown on LB while testing you may set value in MONITOR line (in upsmon.conf) to "0" (zero). But don't forget to set MINSUPPLIES to zero too. See comments in "upsmon.conf" and "man upsmon.conf" for further details. Whith this one you can check if the other parts of nut getting

[Nut-upsuser] Spurious messages on start

2006-11-11 Thread Pedro Côrte-Real
When I start or restart nut I get three spurious messages as everything starts up: UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] is unavailable Communications with UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] lost Communications with UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] established Any way around this? Pedro. _

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Sweex 1000VA UPS

2006-11-11 Thread Arjen de Korte
YvesDM wrote: > Ok, I think it's working. > The problem was the serial cable. That why I recommended to try it under Windows with the bundled software, to rule out a problem like this. > I had 2, one came with the ups, the other came with another ups. > During my tests I changed the original cab

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Segmentation fault

2006-11-11 Thread Magnus Johansson
Peter Selinger skrev: Yes, this has been fixed some time ago in the SVN version. -- Peter Thank you! I got the trunk and installed it, one thing that is a bit strange to me, restarting can cause newhidups to eat up a whole lot of memory or not restart at all... [EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]# /et

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Segmentation fault

2006-11-11 Thread Peter Selinger
Yes, this has been fixed some time ago in the SVN version. -- Peter Magnus Johansson wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm running NUT 2.0.4 and occasionally I get a segfault when starting > newhidups and if I don't get a segfault when starting newhidups the > process starts eating away at my memory. I sat d

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Help with newhidups subdriver for Dynex UPS

2006-11-11 Thread Peter Selinger
Dear Michael, it looks like your efforts were unnecessary. The instructions in hid-subdrivers.txt are intended for devices that are not *already* supported by newhidups. On the other hand, your UPS was made by Cyber Power Systems, and is already supported by the APC/CyberPower subdriver. Note the

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Sweex 1000VA UPS

2006-11-11 Thread Charles Lepple
On 11/11/06, YvesDM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't know if the ups will actually shutdown the system now on low battery. If the status changes to "OB LB", then it should shut your system down (assuming everything else is still configured properly). upsc ain't showing much information on t

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Sweex 1000VA UPS

2006-11-11 Thread YvesDM
On 11/11/06, YvesDM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] We move on... Ok, I think it's working. The problem was the serial cable. I had 2, one came with the ups, the other came with another ups. During my tests I changed the original cable with the other one. I never changed it back, thinking they w

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Sweex 1000VA UPS

2006-11-11 Thread YvesDM
Ok, I 've done some more testing. I did comment out the upsmon entry in /etc/default/nut Then loaded the driver like: /lib/nut/genericups -x upstype=7 /dev/ttyS0It loaded and according syslog:Nov 11 10:19:47 radius1 genericups[8469]: Startup successfulHowever when I tried: radius1:/etc/nut# upsc [E

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Sweex 1000VA UPS

2006-11-11 Thread YvesDM
On 11/10/06, Arjen de Korte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]  If you're willing to try a few more things, comment out the part in theNUT startup script where 'upsmon' is started/stopped and fire it up. With'upsc [EMAIL PROTECTED]' you should be able to see the status of the UPS, without the risk of

[Nut-upsuser] Segmentation fault

2006-11-11 Thread Magnus Johansson
Hi! I'm running NUT 2.0.4 and occasionally I get a segfault when starting newhidups and if I don't get a segfault when starting newhidups the process starts eating away at my memory. I sat down trying to genererate -D debug info, but just because of that I can't get it to do a segfault. S