Re: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-27 Thread Arjen de Korte
Ciprian Vizitiu wrote: > Another thing: am I supposed to be able to see some activity in the > PIPEFN/LOCKFN folder during the declared "AT" timings? 'coz there is none! > :-o And upssched.conf has the same perms like all other files in /etc/ups/ You should see some activity there (the PIPEFN is

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-27 Thread Arjen de Korte
Ciprian Vizitiu wrote: > Ok, most likely it's me but I'm out of ideas right now; last night my very > first attempt was to use "NOTIFYCMD" with > > NOTIFYFLAG ONLINE SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC > NOTIFYFLAG ONBATT SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC > NOTIFYFLAG LOWBATT SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC > > ... and the very simple script fo

RE: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-26 Thread Ciprian Vizitiu
... Of course the line: > AT ONBATT [EMAIL PROTECTED] START-TIMER onbattwarn 60 AT > ONLINE [EMAIL PROTECTED] CANCEL-TIMER onbattwarn Should read: AT ONBATT [EMAIL PROTECTED] START-TIMER onbattwarn 60 AT ONLINE [EMAIL PROTECTED] CANCEL-TIMER onbattwarn So the mistake is not there. Another

RE: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-26 Thread Ciprian Vizitiu
> > 2.0.3 is biting me bad in the upssched department so I > guess I'll have > > to go for SVN. :-( > > Like how? There have not been too many major bugs in upssched > and as far as I know this has not changed significantly (if > at all) since nut-2.0.3. > Could you please describe what is n

RE: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-26 Thread Arjen de Korte
> Really? Silly me then; Megatec looked like a fairly evolved protocol so I > was afraid that, since no RTS/CTS signaling was in place into the > manufacturer supplied cable, maybe plain RX/TX/GND won't do. For example > Minicom showed "Offline" all the time during the tests. Most (if not all) sma

RE: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-26 Thread Ciprian Vizitiu
> Note that the document > you're referring to lists a specific UPS model, it doesn't > state that all devices using this protocol use this pin layout. Really? Silly me then; Megatec looked like a fairly evolved protocol so I was afraid that, since no RTS/CTS signaling was in place into the ma

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-26 Thread Arjen de Korte
> I've got an Unitek iZi UPS 525 with a serial interface. The supplied cable looks fairly simple: RX->RX , TX->TX and GND->GND. Using this cable and Minicom with 2400 8N1 I'm able to issue commands to the UPS using the "Megatec Protocol" http://www.networkupstools.org/protocols/megatec.html so I

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-26 Thread Arjen de Korte
> I've got an Unitek iZi UPS 525 with a serial interface. The supplied cable > looks fairly simple: RX->RX , TX->TX and GND->GND. Using this cable and > Minicom with 2400 8N1 I'm able to issue commands to the UPS using the > "Megatec Protocol" http://www.networkupstools.org/protocols/megatec.html

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Unitek iZi UPS 525

2006-12-26 Thread Arjen de Korte
> I've got an Unitek iZi UPS 525 with a serial interface. The supplied cable looks fairly simple: RX->RX , TX->TX and GND->GND. Using this cable and Minicom with 2400 8N1 I'm able to issue commands to the UPS using the "Megatec Protocol" http://www.networkupstools.org/protocols/megatec.html so I