Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS is not turned off in slave-only configuration?
On Freitag, 24. Juni 2016 04:56, André Hänsel wrote: > On Freitag, 24. Juni 2016 04:15, André Hänsel wrote: > > > I was just about to get the syslog from server-1 when I noticed another problem. server-1 now shuts down immediately after it boots, probably because FSD is still set. (I read about it being a latch.) > > > How is this supposed to work? Is NUT not suitable for setups with multiple-UPSs where they are connected to one server? Or did I configure it wrong? > > I'm sorry, I just noticed that I had the UPS set to master in upsmon.conf. Never mind for now, I'll start over with my experiments. Ok, did some more tests, now the FSD shutdown problem is solved, but it still doesn't turn off the UPS. ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS is not turned off in slave-only configuration?
On Freitag, 24. Juni 2016 04:15, André Hänsel wrote: > I was just about to get the syslog from server-1 when I noticed another problem. server-1 now shuts down immediately after it boots, probably because FSD is still set. (I read about it being a latch.) > How is this supposed to work? Is NUT not suitable for setups with multiple-UPSs where they are connected to one server? Or did I configure it wrong? I'm sorry, I just noticed that I had the UPS set to master in upsmon.conf. Never mind for now, I'll start over with my experiments. ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS is not turned off in slave-only configuration?
On Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 17:50, Roger Price wrote: On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, André Hänsel wrote: > > Now, what I see is that when the UPS feeding server-1 goes LB, > > server-1 is indeed shut down, but it seems that the UPS is never switched off. > > > > This is a problem because when power is restored after shutdown, but > > before the battery runs out (with no load, it continues for quite a > > while), > > server-1 is not rebooted. > > I'm assuming that you have one UPS per server, and that server-1 is fed by UPS-1. Yes, but they are connected to ups-server, not to server-1. (Because server-1 has no USB port.) > When server-1 shuts down, whichever server is in charge of UPS-1 should execute command > > upsdrvctl shutdown UPS-1 > > Does this happen? Is this command called by a script or a systemd service unit? I don't know. upsd has to do that when the slave has shut down, or not? NUT is installed from the Debian (Raspbian actually) jessie package. > Is there any trace of the action of that script/service unit in /var/log/messages or the systemd journal? I have only two UPS-related events in the syslog of ups-server: (I started server-1) Jun 24 01:32:58 ups-server upsd[561]: User monuser@10.10.5.63 logged into UPS [test-apc] (Cut the power to UPS-1 and waited for the battery to become almost empty) Jun 24 01:38:03 ups-server upsd[561]: Client monuser@10.10.5.63 set FSD on UPS [test-apc] I was just about to get the syslog from server-1 when I noticed another problem. server-1 now shuts down immediately after it boots, probably because FSD is still set. (I read about it being a latch.) How is this supposed to work? Is NUT not suitable for setups with multiple-UPSs where they are connected to one server? Or did I configure it wrong? ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS is not turned off in slave-only configuration?
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, André Hänsel wrote: Now, what I see is that when the UPS feeding server-1 goes LB, server-1 is indeed shut down, but it seems that the UPS is never switched off. This is a problem because when power is restored after shutdown, but before the battery runs out (with no load, it continues for quite a while), server-1 is not rebooted. I'm assuming that you have one UPS per server, and that server-1 is fed by UPS-1. When server-1 shuts down, whichever server is in charge of UPS-1 should execute command upsdrvctl shutdown UPS-1 Does this happen? Is this command called by a script or a systemd service unit? Is there any trace of the action of that script/service unit in /var/log/messages or the systemd journal? Roger___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
[Nut-upsuser] UPS is not turned off in slave-only configuration?
I have two hosts. One is the ups-server. It's generator powered and can be assumed to never go down. This is the one that all the UPSs are connected to. It has: - the UPSs configured in upsd.conf - a "upsmon master" user in upsd.users - an empty upsmon.conf The other one is server-1. Its upsmon.conf contains: MONITOR test-apc@ups-server 1 monuser blah slave Now, what I see is that when the UPS feeding server-1 goes LB, server-1 is indeed shut down, but it seems that the UPS is never switched off. This is a problem because when power is restored after shutdown, but before the battery runs out (with no load, it continues for quite a while), server-1 is not rebooted. Is my configuration wrong? How can I help diagnosing this problem? ___ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
