Re: [jira] Commented: (NUTCH-135) http header meta data are case insensitive in the real world (e.g. Content-Type or content-type)

2005-12-10 Thread Jack Tang
Stefan It seemed your patch missing org.apache.nutch.protocol.ContentProperties class, right? /Jack On 12/10/05, Stefan Groschupf (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-135?page=comments#action_12360025 ] Stefan Groschupf commented on NUTCH-135:

[jira] Updated: (NUTCH-135) http header meta data are case insensitive in the real world (e.g. Content-Type or content-type)

2005-12-10 Thread Stefan Groschupf (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-135?page=all ] Stefan Groschupf updated NUTCH-135: --- Attachment: contentProperties_patch_WithContentProperties.txt missed to add the contentproperties itself to the version control... thanks Jack! http

Re: [jira] Commented: (NUTCH-135) http header meta data are case insensitive in the real world (e.g. Content-Type or content-type)

2005-12-10 Thread Stefan Groschupf
Jack, sorry there are now 3kb more in the patch :), please give it another try. Stefan Am 10.12.2005 um 15:30 schrieb Jack Tang: Stefan It seemed your patch missing org.apache.nutch.protocol.ContentProperties class, right? /Jack On 12/10/05, Stefan Groschupf (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Updated: (NUTCH-135) http header meta data are case insensitive in the real world (e.g. Content-Type or content-type)

2005-12-10 Thread Jerome Charron (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-135?page=all ] Jerome Charron updated NUTCH-135: - Attachment: cached.jsp.patch cached.jsp must be patched too. http header meta data are case insensitive in the real world (e.g. Content-Type or

[jira] Resolved: (NUTCH-135) http header meta data are case insensitive in the real world (e.g. Content-Type or content-type)

2005-12-10 Thread Jerome Charron (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-135?page=all ] Jerome Charron resolved NUTCH-135: -- Fix Version: (was: 0.7.2-dev) Resolution: Fixed Committed to trunk (to be merged into branche 0.7?) Thanks Stefan. I have performed unit and